Tutorial: Repack via extract + unpack

[78372]

@Fitgirl I prefer speed rather than size. I can remember one of your repack, Mafia II, which took hours and hours to install. I don't know what you did with that, but I again repacked that, and found it's size is 0.25gb bigger than yours, but takes only a couple of minutes to install. So I always use direct compression instead of pack & unpack

[Gupta]

her repacks are best to store, that's why I first download the original release from groups, install them and then download her repack to store them as archives

[unarc 125]

Originally Posted by PrinceGupta2000

her repacks are best to store, that's why I first download the original release from groups, install them and then download her repack to store them as archives

Then you're seriously Insane PrinceGupta2000. you're downloading the same game twice And you install the iso one and delete it and then store the repacked one ? However you can repack the game at your own ?

[Gupta]

Originally Posted by unarc 125

Then you're seriously Insane PrinceGupta2000. you're downloading the same game twice And you install the iso one and delete it and then store the repacked one ? However you can repack the game at your own ?

got bored of it,that Bitch always wins

[78372]

If I have the original release, I myself repack it for storing. And when you want to store, just download the repacked one because you can install it and also store it

[Gupta]

$H!: takes ages to install

[78372]

Huh, so you store the repack for what? To install it again when required, isn't it?

[Razor12911]

Originally Posted by FitGirl

Haha, a video devoted to finding out how ~ I compressed ACU
Are other RLT guys that bad, they can't figure it out by themselves and they should ask you? Hmmm.

Still, this is a good video for those, who want to knows how complex repacks are done.

Uh, not really. The video is just for the last point you mentioned but apart from that. And it's not RLT. It's these other repack teams, -_- the gap you make in terms of repack sizes is too much, just made this tutorial to ease up the competition (I like to see feuds and tensions between repack teams) otherwise all other repack teams should just retire judging from the amount of things they miss when trying to repack. I mean anybody can apply srep and lzma, there is nothing special in that, the other things that are additionally added is what makes it unique.

[FitGirl]

Yeah, good competition would be nice.

btw, did you try your tool on large resources? I mean like 15 GB resource pack with, say 300k of files?

[DedSec]

Originally Posted by FitGirl

Haha, a video devoted to finding out how ~ I compressed ACU
Are other RLT guys that bad, they can't figure it out by themselves and they should ask you? Hmmm.

Still, this is a good video for those, who want to knows how complex repacks are done.

I fail to see why we would depend on your methods for ACU which is probably 3X slower than the one we already have from months. Additionaly, I had ACU packed with those medieval methods in July 2015 in my old dual core PC. But that's the past, present is faster.

Razor12911's being helpful to teach these kind of methods in repacking which 99% of repackers miss, plus his Injector Maker makes things so easy if the user cant do things on his own.

[RamiroCruzo]

Nice tut bro ^O^ Next time use h.265 XD It kills to download this big thingy, though they are worth it

Originally Posted by DedSec

I fail to see why we would depend on your methods for ACU which is probably 3X slower than the one we already have from months. Additionaly, I had ACU packed with those medieval methods in July 2015 in my old dual core PC. But that's the past, present is faster.

Am sorry, can we talk to the guy who actually writes reply instead of you just forwarding these? As far as I remember, dual core PC was someone else's specs

[Razor12911]

Originally Posted by FitGirl

Yeah, good competition would be nice.

btw, did you try your tool on large resources? I mean like 15 GB resource pack with, say 300k of files?

I honestly have used this tool 3 times, all test subjects were small.
There are ways to improve speed however, I haven't tried them considering the time it tool to make it and facts like I can't currently update the tool AFK

Originally Posted by RamiroCruzo

Nice tut bro ^O^ Next time use h.265 XD It kills to download this big thingy, though they are worth it

I could use h265... or you could climb up a cell tower and download from there :v, jokes...

[FitGirl]

Originally Posted by DedSec

I fail to see why we would depend on your methods for ACU which is probably 3X slower than the one we already have from months. Additionaly, I had ACU packed with those medieval methods in July 2015 in my old dual core PC. But that's the past, present is faster.

Razor12911's being helpful to teach these kind of methods in repacking which 99% of repackers miss, plus his Injector Maker makes things so easy if the user cant do things on his own.

I remember that the size of your ACU repack was pretty big, you 100% didn't do anything with LZO. And why is that?

[FD_RLT]

Originally Posted by RamiroCruzo

Am sorry, can we talk to the guy who actually writes reply instead of you just forwarding these? As far as I remember, dual core PC was someone else's specs

You mean me ? Him or me, probably the same lol

Originally Posted by FitGirl

I remember that the size of your ACU repack was pretty big, you 100% didn't do anything with LZO. And why is that?

Oh I am pretty sure you have remembered something totally wrong, because 1) We haven't done any ACU repack yet and 2) We "100%" did a thing with LZO in ACU.

[FitGirl]

Originally Posted by FD_RLT

You mean me ? Him or me, probably the same lol



Oh I am pretty sure you have remembered something totally wrong, because 1) We haven't done any ACU repack yet and 2) We "100%" did a thing with LZO in ACU.

Yep, I think you did ACS. Yet, why didn't you "did a thing" with LZO in ACS?