Online Gaming - Guild Wars

[DABhand]

just to clarify since the guy couldnt..


from manual on Warrior page

Swordmanship - Swordmanship increases basic sword damage as well as damage dealt by sword skills.


So therefore, more damage no matter the max dmg shown on the sword. So he is wrong.

[DABhand]

Originally Posted by glenbo

i been in guild wars since day dot,and i agree with you dab hand and have seen loads of wierd and wonderful things..

hell i even saw a guy with a river drake as a pet,i searched for months to find of way of getting the animal,i read everywhere you cant,hell i still want one now i dont know how the hell he got it,and i only ever saw one once,right at the beggining of the game at the first river as you leave ascalon for the first time,pre seering.

at kassad,dude this was a pleasent thread,and you come marching in with a mightier than thou attitude,my point is,you have 18 posts,probaly 18 flames.

behave dude,its just a ****ing game and you are acting like its a matter of life and death.

If you could do that, I suppose you could have that Bull you have to kill for the mesmer second profession. He would be good at level 20 running people down lol

[Kassad]

Originally Posted by glenbo

i been in guild wars since day dot,and i agree with you dab hand and have seen loads of wierd and wonderful things..

hell i even saw a guy with a river drake as a pet,i searched for months to find of way of getting the animal,i read everywhere you cant,hell i still want one now i dont know how the hell he got it,and i only ever saw one once,right at the beggining of the game at the first river as you leave ascalon for the first time,pre seering.

at kassad,dude this was a pleasent thread,and you come marching in with a mightier than thou attitude,my point is,you have 18 posts,probaly 18 flames.

behave dude,its just a ****ing game and you are acting like its a matter of life and death.

No you cant get a drake as a pet, no your all wrong, please me your in game names so I can teach you something instead of you talking crap.

[Kassad]

Originally Posted by DABhand

just to clarify since the guy couldnt..


from manual on Warrior page

Swordmanship - Swordmanship increases basic sword damage as well as damage dealt by sword skills.


So therefore, more damage no matter the max dmg shown on the sword. So he is wrong.

DUDE LOL, seriously look at your posts, your werent talking about swordmanship, you were talking about req, I told you about swordmanship.

Ok look here http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...d.php?p=794607

Please stop posting, you've just been burned by the guild wars community. You should of just believed me but no you didnt, your own fault.

[DABhand]

You are indeed an idiot, your the type that has to run to your "pals" and have to tell them what someone else said in a quest to make yourself look bad.


When your talking about Req your ARE talking about the swordmanship when it comes to a sword, as its the level of swordmanship that would allow you or not to use the sword fully.


And if you READ the threads, you would have seen swordmanship WAS talked about. Dont sit there and try to be clever it doesnt work, I asked you a few times to say what swordmanship said, as you said it doesnt matter you would only do the max damage the sword had when I said more swordmanship better damage, but no you said no and was adamant about it.


So take your own advice and READ through the posts and not read what you THINK you read.

Oh and you also SAID, that health+ bonuses while in stance only are on shields, your wrong there also.

Http://www.vwaskar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/fun/gw002.jpg

As you can see I have a low level 5 Ebon Hammer, its great for its health bonuses, Until I find something better. Avg damage I do with this (since im at Sanctum Cay) is about 40dmg with 12 Hammer skill, some monsters take more dmg than the White Mantel guys so I used an avg dmg amount.


I wonder if you gave them the link to this thread also, instead of just telling them what was said, since your intepretation leaves alot to be desired.

[DABhand]

Originally Posted by Kassad

No you cant get a drake as a pet, no your all wrong, please me your in game names so I can teach you something instead of you talking crap.

Thats not what he said, he said he seen and he couldnt figure out how, and I said "If you could do that". I didnt say "Yes you could do that".

Again your reading skills are not great are they?

[Grim Weeper]

ok...gonna try and clear this up

the higher the swordsmanship, the larger the damage you do, no matter what req on the weapon, but having a req 7 sword means you can do the 15-22 damage earlier then you could on a req 12, so you can spend points else-where...you do not do more damage on a req 12, you just think you do, but no..you don't, if you used a req 7 and a req 12 sword at 16 swordsmanship, they would do exactly the same damage, as long as they had exactly the same mods on them...

[Fabius Cunctator]

OK I just couldn't resist to drop a message here.

DABhand, you posted a message that said that weapons with higher a higher req. were better than weapons with lower req.

If your skill in the weapon mastery is less than the req. on the weapon you will do much less damage. If your skill in the weapon mastery is equal or higher than the req. you will do normal damage. The higher your weapon mastery goes the more damage you do, independent of the requirement on the weapon.

Kassad didn't post the "swordsmanship wording" because it's silly, everybody knows what swordsmanship does...

And if you READ the threads, you would have seen swordmanship WAS talked about. Dont sit there and try to be clever it doesnt work, I asked you a few times to say what swordmanship said, as you said it doesnt matter you would only do the max damage the sword had when I said more swordmanship better damage, but no you said no and was adamant about it.

Um... Just because he didn't say the description for swordsmanship doesn't mean you were right about your a weapon with higher req. doing more damage than a weapon of lower req. (in equal circumstances of course).

I don't know about that hammer you posted, looks like a quest reward to me but I'm not sure.

Edit: ah Grim Weeper beat me to it.

[DABhand]

Was found earlier in the game out of a chest, The earth dmg I put on it myself.

I didnt say I was right, saying Kassad is wrong :P

[Kassad]

Originally Posted by DABhand

Was found earlier in the game out of a chest, The earth dmg I put on it myself.

I didnt say I was right, saying Kassad is wrong :P

Too bad im not wrong.

[DABhand]

Only shields have +health in a stance, I proved you wrong there.

You thought we said you can charm other NPC animals, which we didnt, so wrong there.

I could go on :P

[Kassad]

Originally Posted by DABhand

Only shields have +health in a stance, I proved you wrong there.

You thought we said you can charm other NPC animals, which we didnt, so wrong there.

I could go on :P

Dude you said the sword had 40hp in stance, not me, sorry your blind and stupid, charming wha?

Seriously dont post anymore, your post just there proved your ignorant, Shields have hp in stance? yes i know that, I SAID THAT, you said the sword had 40hp in stance, your post just there proved your very very stupid, im not going to bother post in this thread anymore, you have just ended it with your stupidity. Thanks.

[Kassad]

Originally Posted by DABhand

The one I was shown, had max dmg not below max dmg, it was always max dmg. Then your +dmg% over 50% health, health+40 in stance, health+30 always, Quick recovery from crippled. The guy wasnt gonna sell it for less than 120k

The End.

[DABhand]

Originally Posted by Kassad

Dude you said the sword had 40hp in stance, not me, sorry your blind and stupid, charming wha?

Seriously dont post anymore, your post just there proved your ignorant, Shields have hp in stance? yes i know that, I SAID THAT, you said the sword had 40hp in stance, your post just there proved your very very stupid, im not going to bother post in this thread anymore, you have just ended it with your stupidity. Thanks.

Yes I know you said that, read what im saying, I proved you wrong since you said ONLY shields had that bonus.

Learn english.

Im not the one that looked stupid, your the one that came in here flying off the handle.


As I say to all people, re-read everything and if you do in the future re-read this thread, as you can see, you DID NOT read everything, you assumed by reading between the lines.

You took meanings in those posts and transformed them into something else.

Like for example again the pet situation, where both myself and glenbo did NOT say you can do it, glenbo tried to find a way and couldnt, and I said if you could. That is NOT a "yes" to you can charm all animals.


And your inability to read, proved to much for you to even read the simple rules for this place. You flamed over such a trivial thing in a game I seen. That is like 5yo - 10yo "My daddy is better than your daddy" thing. Very Childish.


And I dont know why you quoted on the stats I saw on a sword, I SAW IT, I dont own it, I seen it and reported on what I seen. You yourself jumped in and gave the "im holier than thou" crap.

Running in here as if your some GW god. "I know everything"!. Shame you didnt know about +health in stance bonuses were not just for shields. (you said this)

If your so Good, let us know how well you do in the Tournament next month, by your own recognition you should win the $50,000 right?

But then again its easy to act like yourself when you have your head up your arse.


In my Donald Trump impersonation.

"Kassad, your an idiot, you have no respect for others, your australian (no offence Grumpy), You cant read simple english.

Kassad, your fired"

[Grim Weeper]

weapons with HP in a stance DO NOT exist..