Precomp Vs Precomp Test

29-01-2016, 15:40

panker1992 panker1992 is offline

Registered User

Join Date: Oct 2015

Location: Always Somewhere

Posts: 566

Thanks: 116

Thanked 889 Times in 321 Posts

just wait and check what new masks 2.4 brings :P you will work for days trying to update

here is a quick test, my optimized precomp vs this precomp you posted felice

Quote:

Total Data used : 765 MB
Method used : precomp+static+xz

Precomp 0.45 :

Install Started - 18:29:16.07

Install Finished - 18:39:02.27

total : 9 minutes 44 seconds

My optimized precomp 0.45:

Install Started - 18:44:18.57

Install Finished - 18:53:15.54

total : 8 minutes 57 seconds

__________________
My projects : Masked Compression, lzma2(xz) on Freearc, Zstd compressor for windows
My optimizations : packjpg.exe, zstd, lzham, precomp-dev-0.45.

Last edited by panker1992; 29-01-2016 at 19:01.

The Following User Says Thank You to panker1992 For This Useful Post:
Razor12911 (30-01-2016)

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
What is the best Precomp brute command for Precomp 0.43	Amsal	Conversion Tutorials	3	29-01-2016 18:19
Precomp 0.44 and NEW packjpg.exe (self optimized)	panker1992	Conversion Tutorials	7	14-01-2016 09:23
Reflate test	Razor12911	Conversion Tutorials	8	09-09-2015 00:35
Information about Precomp	Razor12911	Conversion Tutorials	6	02-09-2015 16:10

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:24.