FileForums

FileForums (https://fileforums.com/index.php)
-   Conversion Tutorials (https://fileforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=55)
-   -   Precomp Vs Precomp Test (https://fileforums.com/showthread.php?t=97605)

felice2011 29-01-2016 12:06

Precomp Vs Precomp Test
 
1 Attachment(s)
Test of Compression of a 130 MB data folder containing files (*.jpg, *.png, *.gif, *.mp3, *.mp4, *.txt)

************************************************** *****

Precomp 0.4.5 DEVELOPMENT Version : Out 95.316 MB

Precomp 0.4.4 ALPHA Version : Out 101.594 MB

Precomp 0.3.8 : Out 102.310 MB

************************************************** *****

We Have A New Winner.....:D

Attachment 13421

Mini 29-01-2016 12:51

Precomp 0.3.8 doesn't support compression mp3....

panker1992 29-01-2016 12:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mini (Post 446592)
Precomp 0.3.8 doesn't support compression mp3....


nor precomp 0.44 :)

felice2011 29-01-2016 15:18

:eek:..I took a folder any, all 3 versions Precomp were tested on the same folder.:)
Also removing the mp3 files and leaving only the image files will not change the result....the best compression remains on Precomp045..;)
In addition, the test performed with versions Precomp using PackJPG for JPG recompression, PackMP3 for MP3 recompression (packJPG library v2.5j) & (packMP3 library v1.0f ):rolleyes:
Personally I think that the precomp45 will bring a marked difference compared to the younger brothers.:p

panker1992 29-01-2016 15:40

just wait and check what new masks 2.4 brings :P you will work for days trying to update


here is a quick test, my optimized precomp vs this precomp you posted felice :)

Quote:



Total Data used : 765 MB
Method used : precomp+static+xz




Precomp 0.45 :

Install Started - 18:29:16.07

Install Finished - 18:39:02.27

total : 9 minutes 44 seconds



My optimized precomp 0.45:

Install Started - 18:44:18.57

Install Finished - 18:53:15.54

total : 8 minutes 57 seconds




felice2011 30-01-2016 00:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by panker1992 (Post 446596)
just wait and check what new masks 2.4 brings :P you will work for days trying to update


here is a quick test, my optimized precomp vs this precomp you posted felice :)

Bravo!!!:D;)

Amsal 30-01-2016 00:28

Felice2011, how can I decompress this? Can you give me the arc.in code for precomp 0.45

felice2011 30-01-2016 00:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amsal (Post 446610)
Felice2011, how can I decompress this? Can you give me the arc.in code for precomp 0.45

Code:

unpackcmd = precomp -o$$arcdatafile$$.tmp -r $$arcpackedfile$$.tmp

chum 08-02-2016 14:15

Some games works better with precomp038, others work better with precomp042 and others with 043/044.

felice2011 08-02-2016 15:21

It is a question or a statement...:confused:

chum 08-02-2016 16:11

Statement from my experience with precomp. Some games 038 is only one which work without errors like Dragon Age Inquisition.

In other 042 give same size result to 038 but 042 is much faster than 038.

044 when works give the smaller final size, but 042 is faster than 044.

Example from test with 115mb file from Darksiders:

038= 88mb in 141sec
042= 88mb in 103sec
044= 82mb in 151sec

But i compressed full game(Darksiders) with 038 and 044. With full game 038 was much slower to finish, like 5+hours and final size was 7,03gb. 044 take around 3 hours to finish and final size was 6,60gb.

Bad thing is, decompressing 044 take 50 minutes while 038 take only 30 minutes.

hasandgn34 09-02-2016 04:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by chum (Post 446943)
Statement from my experience with precomp. Some games 038 is only one which work without errors like Dragon Age Inquisition.

In other 042 give same size result to 038 but 042 is much faster than 038.

044 when works give the smaller final size, but 042 is faster than 044.

Example from test with 115mb file from Darksiders:

038= 88mb in 141sec
042= 88mb in 103sec
044= 82mb in 151sec

But i compressed full game(Darksiders) with 038 and 044. With full game 038 was much slower to finish, like 5+hours and final size was 7,03gb. 044 take around 3 hours to finish and final size was 6,60gb.

Bad thing is, decompressing 044 take 50 minutes while 038 take only 30 minutes.

which version "packjpg_dll.dll" did you use on precomp 0.38?
because there are many kind of "packjpg_dll.dll" version. and that is why the time and size can change on the same precomp.exe(for example 0.38)

if you want to use Jpeg compression, you should chose packjpg_dll.dll(137 kb)
buti if you want to skip that, you can use the OTHERs (9-10 kb)

chum 09-02-2016 18:25

038 and 042 was used same PackJpg-Profragger 0.2.2(9kb).

hasandgn34 09-02-2016 19:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by chum (Post 446972)
038 and 042 was used same PackJpg-Profragger 0.2.2(9kb).

if you use packjpg_dll.dll(on 0.38 or 0.42)(137 kb), it would be similar(size and time) compressed file with precomp 0.44 :D

chum 09-02-2016 23:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by hasandgn34 (Post 446975)
if you use packjpg_dll.dll(on 0.38 or 0.42)(137 kb), it would be similar(size and time) compressed file with precomp 0.44 :D

But yet 042 was much faster than 038 using same PackJPG. But there is not only time variance, there has compression ratio and some times compatibility of some files with only 038.

In Dragon Age Inquisition using same PackJPG 042 caused error, while 038 finished without problem.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:55.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
FileForums @ https://fileforums.com