|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
ok let's end the talk here. it can only go nowhere
i have no problem with the program, ok ? my only issue is the time it has taken to become public (and not because i want it) in the last 2 years there was ONE authorized general public release (i don't care about leaks or stolen or such) but why keep a lock on it when you say it is free (which so far it is) if you say because it's unstable, oh dear... isn't such a program by definition almost always in a perpetual beta ? c'mon do you think mum and dad use pid ? it's young men that like to "do sh!t" and have some knowledge of this. also prior to this 2 year lockdown the releases were much more frequent... so, joe, the problem is not the beta name, but that it is a freware/shareware program and yet for 2 years it's not available to public (other then beta testers even if a few hundred) and you don't have to release every minor build tippex but at least a quarterly version to gen public?. you think 4 times a year would have been too much ? and it was also needed... the xmas 07 version is now "almost" usles for new stuff (and by new i mean in some cases protection that's 6 or more months old) ie safedisc 4.9 that some show as "no protection" or almost all tages since that time too... or only show as solidshield but not actual tages.. also why do you confuse the matter of adding extra tools ?? i only say that because you know that doing so will only add more test (beta) time... so then maybe you should have released the lite version before... the more features a program has the more complicated it gets, you agree ? be honest and see the fixes log and how many things in the last 2 years you had to "fix" other then the code related to detecting protection. and even if not some of the features you now have is like a sandra or everest. and you know they alway need updates to recognize the new hardware (cpu, mb chipset etc).. why add such items if that can delay releases for such long periods ? (please let sandra and everest do that, and you specialize in protection detection, what you do best...) you agree nero was once lean and good ? but since years now it's slow and bloated if you install all of it ? nero as a burning app is now like norton products (antivir) to many people, you know slow and bloated crapware. (because i like pid, and others, i don't want to loose you) i think i made my point pretty clear.. i like pid (except all the "tools" added on, but that my opinion) i have no problem with you or anyone just the way the pid was "closed" (and it's NOT because i want it always, it's the principal. do you get that ? or just not believe me about it ? so yes please pm me a link... but you said there is on coming today or such ? so maybe i get that one...) my tip: you know what sort of people use this tool so don't worry about "bugs" hurting systems - just release a public version every 2/3 months!!! and yes like joe, i'm hungarian.... (does that matter ? no. just thought i'd mention it) edit: so i think of something else. i think your knowledge about this subject is highly advanced. you know your stuff no doubt and i think maybe when somebody "criticize" something-anything you take it as attack on you or such ? not true. i admit you are field genius, ok ? Last edited by Magyar; 26-12-2008 at 01:11. |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about burning with Alcohol | nachocheese | PS2 Games | 4 | 10-02-2004 15:17 |
| DJ Burning Question (interesting?) | sour_ranch | DC Games | 2 | 11-01-2004 13:56 |
| Question about burning PS2 DVD's | FantomLord | PS2 Games | 10 | 10-01-2003 14:38 |
| question about burning bin files | fX-Bot | PS2 Games | 3 | 09-04-2002 23:33 |
| question burning max payne??? | sucky | PC Games | 1 | 15-08-2001 17:50 |