Starforce Petition!

[Joe Forster/STA]

Damn right, sir, but I think the Chinese hackers are getting closer and closer!

[caki]

Originally Posted by Joe Forster/STA

Damn right, sir, but I think the Chinese hackers are getting closer and closer!

Never. Not while I have a breath and a bottle of vodka!!!!

Try to guess my descent. Winner gets a cookie.

For the value of one cookie, please refer to the following thread:

http://fileforums.com/showthread.php?t=67339

[Talas]

Have any of you had a look over at starforce's forum?
If you havent yet do it. They are some sneaky bastards, i bet they grow 'happy customers' in the backyard.
Here one of theire threads: http://www.star-force.com/forum/inde...313&#entry2313
http://www.star-force.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=192

And of course i vote no to starforce.

[lucifur2k]

im now just begining to learn about programming so hopefully in about ten years i can be of help in the fight against game protection any one know of any good resources to learn about hacking cracking let me know. boycot sf

[DABhand]

Not really no, learn by knowing ASM inside and out, and how file headers work etc.

[coffin filler]

Originally Posted by DABhand

Not really no, learn by knowing ASM inside and out, and how file headers work etc.

A-MEN

Originally Posted by Talas

Have any of you had a look over at starforce's forum?
If you havent yet do it. They are some sneaky bastards, i bet they grow 'happy customers' in the backyard.
Here one of theire threads: http://www.star-force.com/forum/inde...313&#entry2313
http://www.star-force.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=192

And of course i vote no to starforce.

Yeah. It's getting worse, or maybe better...? For those who haven't, take a look at this link.
http://www.boingboing.net/2006/01/31...hreatens_.html

Yes, me too. Starforce has to go!

[dajunka]

I was here when this Petition got started and we are now up to 297 post, we have them on the run boys.

[Joe Forster/STA]

Those idiots - the managers, not the developers! - at Starforce should wake up, once and for all...

In parallel with biology, and similarly to the effect of gene-manipulated food, it is very hard - and would take a lot of work: money and time! - to prove without doubt that the failure of a hardware or software component in a computer can or cannot be attributed to this or that other component in the same computer (or its close environment, e.g. other computers in the LAN), in our case: namely Starforce.

It is not a surprise that many are against gene-manipulated food, even if they don't know whether it causes cancer or other illnesses or not: 1) the manufacturers of gene-manipulated food don't know for sure either and 2) food problems can be solved in other ways, as well.

So, what's the problem with complaining about a copy protection without provable presence (on our side) or absence (on the developer's side) of bugs, when the real problem is that has gone too far ([edit] read: too low level; compare genes with low-level drivers) and the same problem could be solved in other ways that have less potentially bad consequences for the customer?

[Tyler Durden]

starforce?

Never!

In france,starforce is already forbidden because it writes itself to deep into your system. A very wise decision.

RELOADED, keep fighting!

We will win!