Go Back   FileForums > Game Backup > PC Games

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:37
DABhand DABhand is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Near my PC
Posts: 5,406
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
DABhand is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by revolver
IT shouldnt be a problem to anyone be it they own an original or warez

the simple fact is starforce is f**ked it's is an intrusion of your pc as it doesnt ask permission to install it just does it and also only people who
wish to play without dvd or cd will have problems

so it not whether its a warez or orginal thats the problem its those of us who want to play without a dvd or cd that have problems which is nearly everone on this forum

No protection asks, as ive also said before the protection comes with the game, and you agreed to game being installed.


You show me a game where it asked you if you wished to install the protection?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 06-12-2005, 10:01
DUKE_NUKEM's Avatar
DUKE_NUKEM DUKE_NUKEM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 48
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
DUKE_NUKEM is on a distinguished road
Dabhand I've never heard of protections compromising the stablity of the OS or even destroying hardware components; the assumption that no protection works with every pc configuration is simply ridiculous, if starforce programmers knew what they are doing they would have imposed to put warnings on packages about compatibility issues.
Remember, I spend money buying games, so I have the right to just put the disc in and play, without the risk of damaging my hardware. Publishers who use SF are losing (mind?) customers after customers and the result is that NOBODY, neither legit nor warez users, will buy their games anymore. Sorry, man, but I don't have time to waste after games, just a little time to play; as a consequence I don't want to spend my days formatting and reinstalling every time I change game.
Just the last thing: SF support is not GLAD to help you, it is OBLIGED to help you cause you are just one of them who have the patience (time to waste?) to try all possibilities to make a game work; I just don't have it: shame on me.
But SF programmers are just bastards, like warez kiddies they claim to fight again.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-12-2005, 10:09
Muji-FightR's Avatar
Muji-FightR Muji-FightR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: beyond belief
Posts: 766
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Muji-FightR is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to Muji-FightR Send a message via Yahoo to Muji-FightR
@ Dab Hand (which i guess is the real meaning ?)

If you talk about a new executable, do you talk about an executable without copy protection or just a fixed one?
but i wonder
a) why you wouldnt upload it, guess you would do that
and b) why this didnt come with a patch for the game (whatever this might be)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-12-2005, 10:11
DABhand DABhand is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Near my PC
Posts: 5,406
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
DABhand is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by muJi.fiGHt3r
@ Dab Hand (which i guess is the real meaning ?)

If you talk about a new executable, do you talk about an executable without copy protection or just a fixed one?
but i wonder
a) why you wouldnt upload it, guess you would do that
and b) why this didnt come with a patch for the game (whatever this might be)
Protection was still intact, but I got to play my game which is the main point
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-12-2005, 10:17
DABhand DABhand is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Near my PC
Posts: 5,406
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
DABhand is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by DUKE_NUKEM
Dabhand I've never heard of protections compromising the stablity of the OS or even destroying hardware components; the assumption that no protection works with every pc configuration is simply ridiculous, if starforce programmers knew what they are doing they would have imposed to put warnings on packages about compatibility issues.
Remember, I spend money buying games, so I have the right to just put the disc in and play, without the risk of damaging my hardware. Publishers who use SF are losing (mind?) customers after customers and the result is that NOBODY, neither legit nor warez users, will buy their games anymore. Sorry, man, but I don't have time to waste after games, just a little time to play; as a consequence I don't want to spend my days formatting and reinstalling every time I change game.
Just the last thing: SF support is not GLAD to help you, it is OBLIGED to help you cause you are just one of them who have the patience (time to waste?) to try all possibilities to make a game work; I just don't have it: shame on me.
But SF programmers are just bastards, like warez kiddies they claim to fight again.

They do put up warnings in amongst the EULA, which unfortunately most people wont read.

And no I dont have time, I have a business to run


Thing is was all these people who lost drives had new ones that were lost? I know some had that problem. But SF does use the discs heavily to read the topography of a disc, if a drive had problems it could be due to that and while its checking the disc the drive could give up the ghost.

In a way you could say SF benchmark the discs somewhat.


Again, no one company can test their protection on every possible scenario. You could have a PC with a certain piece of software which is harmless but affects SF, if the SF team knew about that piece of software then they probably would have found a fix for it during testing, but if they dont know they cant really forsee the future.

Its the same with all software, no one company can test their product 100% fully. Its practically impossible.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-12-2005, 10:32
Joe Forster/STA's Avatar
Joe Forster/STA Joe Forster/STA is offline
Senior forum member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Hungary
Posts: 9,836
Thanks: 20
Thanked 342 Times in 224 Posts
Joe Forster/STA is on a distinguished road
If software is buggy by its nature then why add even more, "redundant" software (i.e. the copy protection) to it, when that "redundant" software is known to be based on undocumented or, for other reasons, not completely reliable system functions or heuristics and, therefore, is also known to cause even more problems? (I think I'm counter-proving your statement with your own arguments...)
__________________
Joe Forster/STA
For more information, see the FileForums forum rules and the PC Games forum FAQ!
Don't contact me via E-mail or PM to ask for help with anything other than patches (or software in general) done by me, otherwise your request may be deleted without any reply!
Homepage: http://sta.c64.org, E-mail: [email protected]; for attachments, send compressed (ZIP or RAR) files only, otherwise your E-mail will bounce back!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-12-2005, 13:41
DUKE_NUKEM's Avatar
DUKE_NUKEM DUKE_NUKEM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 48
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
DUKE_NUKEM is on a distinguished road
Easy to place a thousand warnings in the EULA, when the user have already thrown his money away. Too easy.
Thieves. That's what they are. Just like warez kiddies.
And, of course no, they can't check every possible configuration. But their "heavy disc checking" seems to be harmful to ALL drives, either they are in good health or not.
I wish I could see a package with the warning "The heavy disc checking necessary to start this game could potentially damage your CD\DVD drive. The drivers contained in this software could be unpossible to remove and cause problems to your OS. Remember to format afte playing and possibly to buy a new drive". But I still can't see anything of this. So, who is stealing now?!?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-12-2005, 14:30
thebluegr thebluegr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thebluegr is on a distinguished road
Quote:
And, of course no, they can't check every possible configuration. But their "heavy disc checking" seems to be harmful to ALL drives, either they are in good health or not.
Totally agree with this
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-12-2005, 14:55
revolver revolver is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
revolver is on a distinguished road
yeah i agree with that when i frist but my pc i bought an sf game and it screw my new drive within a week

just as well i had my warrenty or i would have had to shell out 20 quid or more for a new one
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
possible starforce clone? skitzdout General Gaming 17 28-06-2006 17:05
StarForce > Starforce Nightmare Optimummind PC Games 42 27-03-2006 05:04
Starforce question. t.foster73 CD/DVD Copy Protections & Utilities 2 21-03-2005 08:13
Dreamcast ATOMISWAVE Petition - New games for our 2nd NeoGeo: The Dreamcast Christuserloeser DC Games 4 21-06-2004 17:08
StarForce 3.xx Investiagtion samson_cheung PC Games 3 10-08-2003 14:41



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 19:46.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
FileForums @ https://fileforums.com