|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Not Really Joe, it is a genuine question. Trying to figure out who has the most problems, legitimate users or warez kiddies. That would kinda show how bad SF is or isnt. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dabhand I guess you don't really get it. The point is Starforce should cause NO problems to legitimate users, as this comes BEFORE causing problems to warez kiddies. I don't think people who are used to d'load gamez would buy SF-protected games as they can't play with warez versions; on the other hand, a lot of honest players just stopped buying them. You can verify it by yourself, the solution is worse then the problem itself.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why they additionaly don't search our chatlogs, mails, posts of our forum accounts, even our google search strings with the application of SF?!?!?
I want it! Scan me you bas**rds! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
IT shouldnt be a problem to anyone be it they own an original or warez
the simple fact is starforce is f**ked it's is an intrusion of your pc as it doesnt ask permission to install it just does it and also only people who wish to play without dvd or cd will have problems so it not whether its a warez or orginal thats the problem its those of us who want to play without a dvd or cd that have problems which is nearly everone on this forum
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is the problem you are all mostly going on with what someone else said.
Also what most people dont realise is not all PC's are the same. SF could have errors due to certain motherboards, drivers, hardware and other software. Doesnt matter what game or protection is out there, people will always and I mean always have problems. DUKE_NUKEM: No you dont get it, like I just said, no protection will work 100% on everyones machine, what im trying to acertain is what is the main problem to people with SF. Im assuming that SF has a built in preservation API, that when detected that an original disc is not in use, it starts problems. What I have said before also is, why dont people contact SF support for help with some games they cant seem to run, I did it for one SF protected game and they were glad to give me another executable which worked perfect. But they do need legitimate game details, which is why I think the vast majority of people who moan about SF is because they cant play their downloaded game and cant contact support for help cause they dont have legitimate details. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
No protection asks, as ive also said before the protection comes with the game, and you agreed to game being installed. You show me a game where it asked you if you wished to install the protection? |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dabhand I've never heard of protections compromising the stablity of the OS or even destroying hardware components; the assumption that no protection works with every pc configuration is simply ridiculous, if starforce programmers knew what they are doing they would have imposed to put warnings on packages about compatibility issues.
Remember, I spend money buying games, so I have the right to just put the disc in and play, without the risk of damaging my hardware. Publishers who use SF are losing (mind?) customers after customers and the result is that NOBODY, neither legit nor warez users, will buy their games anymore. Sorry, man, but I don't have time to waste after games, just a little time to play; as a consequence I don't want to spend my days formatting and reinstalling every time I change game. Just the last thing: SF support is not GLAD to help you, it is OBLIGED to help you cause you are just one of them who have the patience (time to waste?) to try all possibilities to make a game work; I just don't have it: shame on me. But SF programmers are just bastards, like warez kiddies they claim to fight again. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ Dab Hand (which i guess is the real meaning ?)
If you talk about a new executable, do you talk about an executable without copy protection or just a fixed one? but i wonder a) why you wouldnt upload it, guess you would do that and b) why this didnt come with a patch for the game (whatever this might be) |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
They do put up warnings in amongst the EULA, which unfortunately most people wont read. And no I dont have time, I have a business to run ![]() Thing is was all these people who lost drives had new ones that were lost? I know some had that problem. But SF does use the discs heavily to read the topography of a disc, if a drive had problems it could be due to that and while its checking the disc the drive could give up the ghost. In a way you could say SF benchmark the discs somewhat. Again, no one company can test their protection on every possible scenario. You could have a PC with a certain piece of software which is harmless but affects SF, if the SF team knew about that piece of software then they probably would have found a fix for it during testing, but if they dont know they cant really forsee the future. Its the same with all software, no one company can test their product 100% fully. Its practically impossible. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| possible starforce clone? | skitzdout | General Gaming | 17 | 28-06-2006 17:05 |
| StarForce > Starforce Nightmare | Optimummind | PC Games | 42 | 27-03-2006 05:04 |
| Starforce question. | t.foster73 | CD/DVD Copy Protections & Utilities | 2 | 21-03-2005 08:13 |
| Dreamcast ATOMISWAVE Petition - New games for our 2nd NeoGeo: The Dreamcast | Christuserloeser | DC Games | 4 | 21-06-2004 17:08 |
| StarForce 3.xx Investiagtion | samson_cheung | PC Games | 3 | 10-08-2003 14:41 |