|
#5
15-02-2005, 12:50
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK, thank you for your opinions, but what are the reasons for choosing 3rd party? Is it simply more space? Perhaps more bang for your buck?
One of my goals is to eliminate any unnecessary extra work/headaches. I would really like to stay away from things like patching, homebrew apps, and exploit. Having said so, I was under the impression that with Sony HDD, you can run some of the games fine whereas you would need patching for those games if you used 3rd party HDD. Is this correct or wrong? I'm not totally convinced either way(Sony or 3rd party) yet. If I see motivations/reasons for choosing one over the other, maybe I can make up my mind. Can you help me please. Thanks 
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| getting non sony hd to show on browser and defrag a non sony hd | snake2 | PS2 Games | 0 | 22-08-2004 21:47 |
| Third Party Version 1-4 laser development. | ihaveanosebleed | PS2 Games | 4 | 25-02-2004 23:03 |
| SONY DRU-500A: Pro's Con's, POST HERE | ajmi982 | PS2 Games | 1 | 02-11-2002 23:14 |
| Sony To Take on Australian Government Over Modchips | crispy81 | PS2 Games | 0 | 08-02-2002 22:57 |
| Sony wins over PS2 Mod Company :( | doctorB | PS2 Games | 3 | 26-01-2002 22:21 |
Threaded Mode