Go Back   FileForums > Game Backup > PC Games
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 29-01-2006, 16:22
ASIIndustries ASIIndustries is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: U.K
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ASIIndustries is on a distinguished road
I dont see why we should just boycott the games that do have Starforce secretly installed on them, would it not be better to boycott the publishers that are known use the dreaded Starforce protection in their published games!

ASIIndustries.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 30-01-2006, 11:40
coffin filler's Avatar
coffin filler coffin filler is offline
Die Hard Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: england/rome/spain depending what im playing
Posts: 427
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
coffin filler is on a distinguished road
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASIIndustries
I dont see why we should just boycott the games that do have Starforce secretly installed on them, would it not be better to boycott the publishers that are known use the dreaded Starforce protection in their published games!

ASIIndustries.
Whilst what you say makes sence it would (imo) be hard to make work. ie Lets say a publisher protects a game with SF but has another release thats protected with another copy protection then we (the consumer) would be loosing out x2 fold. Due to not buying the SF protected game and then not buying other games released from that publisher that are not SF protected because lets face it there have been some good releases that have SF protection and those of us who take part in the boycott obviously loose out. We need to make it known that we only have a problem with SF protected games regardless of who releases them and i belive the best way to send that message it to boycott all/any SF protected game/app. If a publisher has (in the past/present) released or will release a SF protected game then only boycotting the games that are SF protected will soon give the publishers/developers the message that our gripe is SF and only SF. It would be counterproductive to boycott a publisher/developer compleatly just because they have released a game in the past with SF on it because by only boycotting that SF release will the message will be loud + clear.

Its only if enough of us compleatly 100% boycott SF protected games will it make a difference. However for this to happen there needs to be a vast % of the gaming public taking part in this for it to be felt financialy by those who decide if SF is used.This means that even when a excellent game is released that we have been awaiting is released but has SF protection we bite our lip and remember its for the bigger picture but i guess that many people crack at this point and buy the SF game. (this will send out a message that as long as a game is good and has been marketed correctly ect SF will not loose profits making the boycott of ours less productive

Thats my opinion. I Support the boycott and have since the begining (as i have stated in this thread previously) so come on guys/gals lets protect our PC's, and think about the consequences SF poses. I just hope someone manages to take SF development to court and wins (or would it be the publishers who were taken to court as they made the decision to protect the game with SF). Who would be accountable ? There are so many uncertancies and a sucessfull suit against SF could open the flood gates (this is new territory) and so is the way in which SF works. If anyone knows of anything going through the courts or already gone through concerning SF id be very intrested to have a read. Any links will be appreciated.

Thats my ramble over
__________________
[B]M/B=K8N NEO4 Platinum.Bios v1.B0.[/B]
[B]CPU=AMD ATHLON 64. 3000+GHz..Overclocked[/B]
[B]GPU=X16 PCI Express 7950GT 512MB..(Driver v94.24)[/B]
[B]RAM=1024 MB PQI DDR 400 Turbo Dual channel Ultra low latency Memory [/B]
[B]LITE-ON DVD+ - R/+ - RW DRIVE X16[/B]
[B]Sound = Creative SB Live[/B]
[B]O/S Windows XP Home (Fully updated)[/B]
[B]DirectX=9.0c (0904)[/B]
[B]Yes God made game's,Booze,Drug's+Women. (Which proves he's a man :-)[/B]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-03-2006, 23:47
Stinger87 Stinger87 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stinger87 is on a distinguished road
Hey guys, I was going to buy a game that had recieved some good reviews, but I decided to rent it first... good thing to, as it has StarForce 3 and it's not on your list.

It's Ricky Ponting International Cricket 2005, known in other countries as Brian Lara Cricket 2005, so yeah, another one to watch out for.

Damn StarForce! I'm right behind you guys.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-03-2006, 20:38
midfingr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
More tidbits

Yikes! I guess you've seen the latest news regarding Starforce and Stardock..?

Stardock, maker of GalCiv2 was critizied by Starforce for not using their cp. The thread has since been locked, but this has caused quite a stirr.

Linkies:
http://forums.galciv2.com/index.aspx...aid=106741&c=1
http://www.star-force.com/forum/inde...topic=670&st=0
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=1209

This one even made gamespot's PC news: http://www.gamespot.com/news/6145864.html
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-03-2006, 21:36
Grumpy's Avatar
Grumpy Grumpy is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,695
Thanks: 1,256
Thanked 1,851 Times in 812 Posts
Grumpy is on a distinguished road
@midfingr
The interview, on Gamespot, with Galactic Civilations II lead designer and Stardock head Brad Wardell is very interesting. He brings up a few things that have been mentioned many times before but which have been argued about time and time again! The main point being:
Quote:
Most people who pirate a software product would never have purchased it.
Now I have heard a lot of you talk about this!

Another interesting point is:
Quote:
EBGames has released their top-selling PC games from last week. Galactic Civilizations II was number one. So if piracy is such a menace, it's not apparently affecting us to the degree that some say it should.
Ive always maintained that if a game is good enough people will purchase it!

I think they are on the right path with the updates idea. But the problem is, will developers/publishers start releasing unfinished games (with files purposely missing) so that you need to patch it before you play?
This in my opinion would not be a bad thing! It would sort of be like what we had to do with Halflife 2. That being we had to download files before we could play. Difference with Halflife 2 being we had to still use the CD to play until they succumbed and released the patch to allow the use of NoCD.
__________________
Can't find a Game Conversion? Check the 'Conversion INDEX'
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-03-2006, 09:45
Grumpy's Avatar
Grumpy Grumpy is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,695
Thanks: 1,256
Thanked 1,851 Times in 812 Posts
Grumpy is on a distinguished road
@HBAndrew
Quote:
will be downloaded and played
May I suggest you have a read of the forum rules before you bother to post such dribble again!!
__________________
Can't find a Game Conversion? Check the 'Conversion INDEX'
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-03-2006, 12:35
Rayder's Avatar
Rayder Rayder is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 92
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rayder
UGH!!! I just got burned by buying a game that had the StarForce virus/rootkit (whatever) in it. L.A. Rush. Luckily, I checked GCW before opening it....

It's a good thing I didn't open it. If I would have opened it, I would have been stuck with it. Back to the store it goes. And when I take it back, I'll be sure to let them know that it was because of the potentially damaging protection that it contains as my reason for bringing it back.

Loss of sales +1 thanks to StarForce....and NOT piracy!

The StarForce-infested list of games NEEDS TO BE A STICKY POST so we can reference it quickly, without having to hunt down this petition thread. Could that please be added?

Last edited by Rayder; 16-03-2006 at 12:40.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-03-2006, 03:54
Killpuppy's Avatar
Killpuppy Killpuppy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: nashville tn usa
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Killpuppy is on a distinguished road
Starforce f**ks me the buyer

therefore I shall f**k Starforce by not buying any more of their s**t

* Not everyone here is a pirate but I feel treated as one when I encounter a Starforce title
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-04-2006, 10:41
Rayder's Avatar
Rayder Rayder is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 92
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rayder
The lawsuits are starting!!!!!

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=1559

WOOT!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31-05-2006, 04:36
TameBest TameBest is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: France
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
TameBest is on a distinguished road
Move2Play protected via Starforce 3...

When playing a game, I'm buying the game ! I'm a Starcraft and Warcraft addict and I bought all originals...
My way of playing is to make an ISO image and play it via Daemon tools. The reason is CDs and DVDs suffer much too much !
Last week I bought the "Move2Play" game (an Eyetoy like for PC) and detected a Starforce 3 protection on it :-(
My kids are 9 and 3 years old... they aren't carefull enough which means they are screwing games sometimes.
2 weeks ago, my 3 years old son came to me with my original "Toy Story 2" DVD... Totally SCREWED by himself: "it doesn't work dad !" (of course, he just broke it in 2 parts !)
With Starforce 3 (and above), it seems there is NO possibility for a backup :-(
This was the ONE AND ONLY Starforce protected game I ever bought !
This will be my way of boycotting Starforce in the future...
Just because I cannot possibly be present each tims my son will play on the computer...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 26-07-2006, 07:59
VenOmaX666's Avatar
VenOmaX666 VenOmaX666 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: tunisia
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
VenOmaX666 is on a distinguished road
Angry starforce must be illegal

i never buy starforce games i hate this protection
i want to know if they say in the game box that the game is starforce protected so i will never be fooled...

starforce may die ...
were all with you guys
gl
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29-07-2006, 07:31
CaveACane CaveACane is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
CaveACane is on a distinguished road
Exclamation

There is absolutely no way I will ever buy a Starforce protected game. I don't care how good it is !!!!

I once installed Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell Chaos Theory and it slowed my CD/DVD drive down to nothing !!!

Once bitten twice shy... if its Starforce protected its not worth the risk of installing. Anyone who has had this experience will tell you the same.

There is always another game !!!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 24-08-2006, 05:17
-AxA- -AxA- is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Holland
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
-AxA- is on a distinguished road
After installing SH3 (a game with starforce) i've problems:
- Computer has slow down
- Once in a while a blue screen
- errors saying that i don't have enough intern mermory

So now i'm boycottin Starforce
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 24-08-2006, 11:25
shinyrory's Avatar
shinyrory shinyrory is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lapland
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
shinyrory is on a distinguished road
Starforce was installed on my comp and it messed up my dvd burner. Never buying a starforce protected game again.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-01-2007, 15:35
rz22g rz22g is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Seal Beach, CA
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
rz22g is on a distinguished road
Yes, I am boycotting Starforce games

Yes, I am boycotting Starforce games

My system started running strange and I had not even heard of starforce. I found info on it after searching for my system symptoms on the internet. Come to find out Starforce had installed by either a game or demo without my knowledge. It is also annoying now to spend time downloading a demo, going through the install process and then being prompted about starforce. At the very very least, starforce installation should be listed as one of the requirements in the system requirements of the game.

I have gone a step further and cancelled my fileshack account. I feel that they should in some way tag what demos contain starforce and will not continue to use their service until they do. It is bad enough that a game will install Starforce but a DEMO!!!!! Thats just stupid.

Last edited by rz22g; 12-01-2007 at 15:49.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
possible starforce clone? skitzdout General Gaming 17 28-06-2006 17:05
StarForce > Starforce Nightmare Optimummind PC Games 42 27-03-2006 05:04
Starforce question. t.foster73 CD/DVD Copy Protections & Utilities 2 21-03-2005 08:13
Dreamcast ATOMISWAVE Petition - New games for our 2nd NeoGeo: The Dreamcast Christuserloeser DC Games 4 21-06-2004 17:08
StarForce 3.xx Investiagtion samson_cheung PC Games 3 10-08-2003 14:41



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 15:25.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
FileForums @ https://fileforums.com