CLS for Razor Archiver(cls-rz)

[KaktoR]

Originally Posted by Randy2

Yeah keep it in your secret pocket
Fuck you guys.
Your all are shit.
Not helping at all.
Just nothing.

And that's the reason why nobody want to make sources public anymore. Just because of ungratefull guys who not to be able to get enough. And because of bloodsucking vultures

[ravencrow]

Originally Posted by 78372

I don't know if cls-srep source by profager is available or not, better ask profager.

Download srep's source and CLS example in CPP, add all the libraries in cls project, instead of creating file use clsstream to process, remove executable part codes like detecting params and stuff. Change default value of mem cause CLS can't use more than 2 GB, and you're done.

Of course you can do all that if you have knowledge else it'd turn up to be a disaster.

[78372]

rz.exe has no libraries or dlls, and I don't program in C++ :P

[ravencrow]

Originally Posted by 78372

rz.exe has no libraries or dlls, and I don't program in C++ :P

Razor can be made to work with stdio if ya know how to make splash screen easily

[78372]

You are talking about creating a decoy dll, right?

[ravencrow]

Originally Posted by 78372

You are talking about creating a decoy dll, right?

Nopes, decoy DLL won't work in its case cause it doesn't use loadlibrary

[78372]

Originally Posted by ravencrow

Nopes, decoy DLL won't work in its case cause it doesn't use loadlibrary

Sure? Because rz somehow loads a windows dll afaik

[ravencrow]

Originally Posted by 78372

Sure? Because rz somehow loads a windows dll afaik

When we use decoy DLL, we exploit the fact that loadlibrary first looks for the DLL in the directory where the exe is and then looks up in windows index, but in razor's case it different.

[Razor12911]

Originally Posted by ravencrow

When we use decoy DLL, we exploit the fact that loadlibrary first looks for the DLL in the directory where the exe is and then looks up in windows index, but in razor's case it different.

I tested this a few days ago and it works and I don't think it matters whether implicit or explicit method of linking a library was used, might be wrong but method works.

[ravencrow]

Originally Posted by Razor12911

I tested this a few days ago and it works and I don't think it matters whether implicit or explicit method of linking a library was used, might be wrong but method works.

Would be nice if it worked, will save the trouble of using asm to patch it, did you try it for the library which exports CreatefileW? (Or whichever one it uses)

[Razor12911]

Well it worked alright and asm is not for all of us, I'm pascal based.

C:\Users\Zee\Desktop\razor>arc.exe x -w.\ -dpunpacked\ data.arc
FreeArc 0.67 (March 15 2014) extracting archive: data.arc
Extracting 1 file, 86,347,072 bytes. Processed   0%
  Overwrite unpacked\UI.sb?
  (Y)es / (N)o / (A)lways / (S)kip all / (U)pdate all / (Q)uit? a
Extracted 1 file, 13,722,028 => 86,347,072 bytes. Ratio 15.89%
Extraction time: cpu 0.30 sec/real 1.07 sec = 28%. Speed 80.35 mB/s
All OK


C:\Users\Zee\Desktop\razor>pause
Press any key to continue . . .

[External compressor:razor]
header    = 0
packcmd   = rz a -y -d {option} $stdio$ <stdin> <stdout>
unpackcmd = rz e -y $stdio$ <stdin> <stdout>

[shazzla]

Originally Posted by Razor12911

[External compressor:razor]
header = 0
packcmd = rz a -y -d {option} $stdio$ <stdin> <stdout>
unpackcmd = rz e -y $stdio$ <stdin> <stdout>

what version of rz.exe can be used like this ?
am i missed something ?

[78372]

Originally Posted by shazzla

what version of rz.exe can be used like this ?
am i missed something ?

This only works when you managed to create a decoy dll for rz, else not.

[shazzla]

ok ,thanks ,but how can i create/use one ?
im totally noob for this. :/

[78372]

Not much easy only programmers like Razor12911 can do it