SharpSFV - A Spiritual Sucessor to QuickSFV

[FitGirl]

Thanks for the tool, but could you also upload "static" build w/o need to install Dotnet for endusers?

[L33THAK0R]

Originally Posted by FitGirl

Thanks for the tool, but could you also upload "static" build w/o need to install Dotnet for endusers?

Unfortunately not, I'm only somewhat alright with high-level languages, I have no experience with low-level languages like C++ & Rust. My current solution searches for the .NET 10 installation at the default path (Assuming C: is the system drive), if not found my installer enables the .NET 10 redist download option (under my redist menu), and installs post-install. It's not perfect but it's the only viable solution I've got currently. C# is an easy language to learn but is mainly designed to work with the .NET runtime/libraries. Maybe down the road I'll look into porting the codebase to something independent, but the costs far outweigh the benefits. Even if using SharpSFV without .NET 10 being installed, there is enough logic embedded in the application to direct the end-user to the appropriate download page.

[Masquerade]

^^
FitGirl means for the .NET runtime to be built into the compiled executable, please see below:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/...c-sharp-wpf-pr

However in my experience, this leads the compiled file to be 30-40mb in size.

[L33THAK0R]

Originally Posted by Masquerade

^^
FitGirl means for the .NET runtime to be built into the compiled executable, please see below:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/...c-sharp-wpf-pr

However in my experience, this leads the compiled file to be 30-40mb in size.

Given the 81-298X increase in file size (~110MiB uncompressed, ~30.5MiB compressed (xtool+srep+lolz), versus not including the .NET runtime, I wouldn't even consider this a valid alternative.