|
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
why Delta?
__________________
- All life is an experiment. The more experiments you make the better. - |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mh. Good question. In my Tiny Tool Compressor GUI everything that is listed there is combined with Delta or xDelta3.
Isn't that what you really need? I like to learn something about it. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Delta: binary tables preprocessor. You don't need to use it on compressed game files (zlib , ...). Use it on executable files.
__________________
- All life is an experiment. The more experiments you make the better. - |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“WE ALL GO A LITTLE MAD SOMETIMES” |
| The Following User Says Thank You to PsYcHo_RaGE For This Useful Post: | ||
ScOOt3r (23-02-2021) | ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you very much and I've learned something again.
Since we're just explaining ... is there a difference between razor and razorx? And is it better than nanozip or fl2? Last edited by biotec2k8; 19-02-2021 at 01:27. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Razor may be good in some files, but nanozip is great.
__________________
- All life is an experiment. The more experiments you make the better. - |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nanozip with CM just has a disadvantage. It takes a very long time to compress and decompress. But the rate is above average
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to biotec2k8 For This Useful Post: | ||
dixen (21-02-2021) | ||
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Right but nanozip might be slower when compared to Razor/RazorX
__________________
“WE ALL GO A LITTLE MAD SOMETIMES” |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|