|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know you don't have much data to go on, but how does xtool+dedup compare against xtool+srep?
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Masquerade For This Useful Post: | ||
shazzla (17-08-2020) | ||
| Sponsored Links |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The idea of new xtool is not replace srep. It's purpose is not to recompress duplicate chunks, but just copy them, which makes less CPU load and faster overall decompression. You still need to run srep after xtool, cause it will deal with unpacked duplicated chunks.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to FitGirl For This Useful Post: | ||
shazzla (17-08-2020) | ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello, here is more data:
Both Scribblenauts games, +comic book (pdf format): Original size: 1.84GB ![]() So, the xtool 2020 is running with zlib+preflate method, maybe I should have disabled it so it's zlib vs zlib. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Masquerade For This Useful Post: | ||
Razor12911 (21-08-2020) | ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sucks to be me I guess. I don't knowingly do this.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
hmm, final size after compression?
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
With xtool r12: 1.38GB
I feel slightly ashamed for not thinking the data could be encrypted. Didn't test to make a full archive with 2020, I will do this if you wish. Every time I put xtool 2020 up against xtool r12, r12 always produces a larger size. Both run at 128m chunk size. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Dev]XTool | Razor12911 | Conversion Tutorials | 180 | 23-10-2020 06:26 |
| Project Cars Digital Edition (3xDVD5) (srep+lzma) | GTX590 | PC Games - CD/DVD Conversions | 10 | 28-08-2017 08:34 |
| Project IGI Anthology 1xCD700 CIUV2 2039 | mausschieber | PC Games - CD/DVD Conversions | 0 | 24-07-2017 15:12 |
| Space Channel 5 Part 2 Translation Project | Christuserloeser | DC Games | 0 | 21-06-2004 18:16 |