|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Precompressor is really necessary?. why can't i use
SREP+LZMA or LOLZ or LZMA2? Why do we have to use Precompressor. It's slowing down extremely, That's why i ask to get better answer From tou guys. I have done more testing... With oodle compression it took 16h to complete. Without oodle, it only took 5 hours to complete. both are use the same srep +lzma options. Oodle is extremely slow. Different BTW just one DVD. With srep+lzma 9xDVD5 final disk 3.98GB with oodle 8xDVD5 final disk 750mb For installing oodle take to much time like 1h 35m And use cpu 100% all the time. With srep+lzma only use 30% under, and install around 35m / 45m so my question is Precompressor is really necessary? If i don't use that, i can save lot of time. is there any other trick available, That i can use with srep+lzma To get better ratio? I Have learn lot of thing from you guys and i really appreciate it and im glade you guys are to help
__________________
Keep Up The Good Works! |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| xnLZ - parallel lzma with entropy scan intended as 64bit 4x4:lzma replacement | elit | Conversion Tutorials | 9 | 20-04-2025 13:07 |
| New Fox Kompressor 1.01c Ultimate | felice2011 | Conversion Tutorials | 31 | 07-06-2023 14:58 |
| Company of Heroes | sylar91 | PC Games - Protection List | 2 | 01-07-2011 04:31 |