|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Srep can indirectly show if delta is good or not, anything srep's ratio can go below 70 or 65% then delta helps.
dont forget that srep delta and lzma are all based on lz77 matchfinding architecture
__________________
My projects : Masked Compression, lzma2(xz) on Freearc, Zstd compressor for windows My optimizations : packjpg.exe, zstd, lzham, precomp-dev-0.45. |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to panker1992 For This Useful Post: | ||
| Sponsored Links |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You hope to replace every reoccurrence firstly and then again try to do so and hope it will be smaller...LOL...It's Common Sense of Humanity Missus....
__________________
We are such stuff as dreams are made on, and our little life is rounded with a sleep. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
[QUOTE=panker1992]Srep can indirectly show if delta is good or not, anything srep's ratio can go below 70 or 65% then delta helps./QUOTE]
Not corrensponds to my tests at all. Especially bad delta behaves on different textures data. As SREP is just a simple LZ77 with extra-large dictionary, it can't say if the data consists of binary tables or not. In my brute-forcing sctipts is always one of the steps, but as i said above, it rarely gives any benefit, but makes compression worst in much more cases. Mad Max is a good example. It hase astonoshing srep removal rate, but using delta will hurt the compression ratio due to lots of textures inside. Last edited by FitGirl; 11-09-2016 at 09:07. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Got it !
Corepacks Just use a modified Version of Precomp. They Use Precomp+Srep64+Lzma64.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Modified precomp? :v since when they know how to program?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Razor I'd like to ask you because i saw a Zlib1.dll which is around 50 kb , the one we use is around 100 KB I found it in SYter Repacks so any difference ??
![]() Updated the same as FitGirl the both are using Zlib1.dll with precomp038 which is 59 KB Those 2 Guys are using same methods / tools almost the sameupdated Same as precomp 321KB , original ~600kb less size than usual so is they using a modified version or they are basically compressing it ?? updated also precomop043 original size 1.015 KB the one they are using is 1.160 KB now i don't think they compressed the files I'm not sure about it's modified or not But maybe i'll do some speed tests
Last edited by aswadd; 13-10-2016 at 09:05. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sorry my fault.
They uses 1.160 KB version of Precomp which contains cls patch but with brute. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Masked Compression (Ultimate compression in one go) | panker1992 | Conversion Tutorials | 661 | 13-05-2024 16:51 |
| Best Compression Format | DRAGoN.X | Chit Chat | 11 | 07-09-2017 23:13 |
| M&S_Kompressor By DLG | felice2011 | Conversion Tutorials | 93 | 21-01-2017 08:12 |
| Detect the compression methods of Repackers ? | aswadd | Conversion Tutorials | 49 | 10-08-2016 18:01 |
| compression -msrep+rep+delta+nzip | Danik1B9 | Conversion Tutorials | 11 | 21-12-2014 08:13 |