|
|
|
#1
20-01-2007, 04:14
|
||||
|
||||
|
In short: you can't compare the raw MHz's. If you want to compare the effective power then run the same benchmarks on this computer and a Pentium-based one and compare the results. Make sure to run all kinds of benchmarks: general, office-related, game-related etc.
__________________
Joe Forster/STA For more information, see the FileForums forum rules and the PC Games forum FAQ! Don't contact me via E-mail or PM to ask for help with anything other than patches (or software in general) done by me, otherwise your request may be deleted without any reply! Homepage: http://sta.c64.org, E-mail: [email protected]; for attachments, send compressed (ZIP or RAR) files only, otherwise your E-mail will bounce back! 
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
#2
20-01-2007, 21:24
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think AMD's time at the top is over. Intel got their act together and released a chip that can be very effective with games.
AMD's idea of regudgerating older hardware into newer CPU's isnt cutting it. The X2 chip has been a disaster IMHO, the FX on the other hand is very nice. But Intel's Cell will blast them out the water.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
