Legal and forum rule-related discussion concerning BF2142 mini image

[DABhand]

Nahhh I was in there.


Seems he is accusing us 3 of supposedly "taking the piss"


To each their own I guess.

[GLH]

free translation of KeelMan's post:

"@siix: i'm not a post-writer, i'm only a post-reader here on FF, but now i need to post something, before i become ill.

You don't recognize that DABhand, Grumpy and JoeForster makes ridiculous of you.
This should be under your proud. I wouldn't post anything again in this thread, because this people have a board before the head.

I love heavy discussions, but if them don't come to an end, and such people don't want to understand your arguments and hide himself behind stereotype and bad formulate states, then i don't have the desire for this.

I recommend to you, don't post again in this thread and give yourself you're right."

[Joe Forster/STA]

This is a situation what we Hungarians call "milling in two mills" (neither party is really listening to the other in an argument). From the law's point of view, siiix may be right (don't wanna start discussing it again); however, this board may be stricter (in some aspects), to defend itself.

And I am STILL waiting for a short and more-to-the-point explanation from him about what his problem with the forum rules really is. As there have been days already without him giving a simple answer to my simple question - although the question has been asked multiple times and he has been around -, it is me who starts wondering that, perhaps, he only wants to show off with his legal knowledge here. Yes, it's very interesting but not very on-topic here...