Battle for Middle-Earth 2 version 1.03

Hi,
what's wrong with carbon-cracks?
I'm not that into it, but they seem to work?

[laziffer]

For me the 1.03 Crack works great.

[BarryB]

Originally Posted by phil8900

Hi,
what's wrong with carbon-cracks?
I'm not that into it, but they seem to work?

That maybe the case, but according to my source they appear to be existing cracks with the headers realigned and resources changed to reflect version numbers, making them FAKE!

Check the reloaded v1.0 crack for Commandos Strike Force, and the Carbon 1.2 crack in LordPE. Look at the Section Table and notice how the Voffset and Vsize are IDENTICAL! Also note there are the same number of sections and the last section in the Carbon crack has been renamed to .cre and in the Reloaded crack it's .rld! Now if you dump those two sections to disk and hex compare them they are identical except for an extra 143 bytes of zeros padded onto the .cre section, probably due to realigning of the section.

Also, if you compare the second data section you'll find that 1.00 in the reloaded crack has changed to 1.20 in the Carbon crack!

Now things get a little more interesting if you dump the _rwcseg section and compare them, guess who's name appears in the Carbon crack, yup it's phil8900!!!

Now WHY is YOUR name in a Carbon crack?

[DABhand]

The 0'd section will probably be Reloaded's sig been removed from there.

[caki]

lol

Hi,
w00T????

edit: ok, just checked it - i get what you mean.

but you can be sure it wasn't me, why should I do that?!

It does NOT make any sense...

[Utzenflatz]

hehehe
to the topic ...
the maxi? mini? hm... images are working for me

[cdkiller]

Now things get a little more interesting if you dump the _rwcseg section and compare them...

the "_rwcseg" section isn´t part of the securom protection. so...

what's wrong with carbon-cracks?

dunno... they just released Blitzkrieg 2 Update v1.5, GRAW v1.06, RollerCoaster Soaked Update... they seems to be fine, both, the sf3 and sec7 cracks.