Ubisoft and Starforce

[Anti669]

Originally Posted by muJi.fiGHt3r

Well, it seems they did not release any good FPS since Far Cry, did they ?

Ubi didn't make Far Cry - Crytek did (Ubi was just the publisher).
Anyway, I'd say King Kong was a good FPS (though a bit different from everything else out there ).

[Muji-FightR]

Originally Posted by Anti669

Ubi didn't make Far Cry - Crytek did (Ubi was just the publisher).
Anyway, I'd say King Kong was a good FPS (though a bit different from everything else out there ).

Sure, thats why i wrote 'release'
The publishers release games, the developers develope/make/create games
King Kong is no pure FPS imo... running around with a monkey in third person perspective and smacking t-rex' in the face is no FPS

[thE reaL M.A. Rapman]

@ all!

Was that the question of Tyler Durden??

[Grumpy]

@thE reaL M.A. Rapman
Well we just figured you had already answered his question so now we just.........well went off topic!

[Anti669]

@muJi.fiGHt3r: My point is just that Ubi can't take any credit for how good Far Cry is.

[Muji-FightR]

somehow they have to be responsible for the games they release...
they decide which game they gonna release, so i doubt they dont have a look at it...
sure they didnt make the game itself but they obviously can at least point the direction by choosing the game...
if Far cry was crap, they would not have released or bought it from Crytek..

[ByteMare]

Farcry was good, it's a shame that SF was "invented" to the rest..especially SC:CT...nice works but the debugger can still find you, bitch...the VM here is very impressive