Go Back   FileForums > Game Backup > PC Games

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-12-2005, 03:27
Aristarchus Aristarchus is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Greece
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Aristarchus is on a distinguished road
Hi! In the last months i have come to realise that the achohol 120% and fake image way spreads as a solution to the backing-up games problem while the traditional no-cd(dvd) fixed exe is fading out. That makes me wonder... why do people want to make their lives harder with all that images, programs that work only in MS windows systems and stuff? Have all the crackers like deviance died or been been arrested or something? I guess not because recently they released a crack for quake 4 (old traditional fixed *.exe) which by the way has the same protection system like civ 4 (for which a crack hasn' t been released but that bloody image stuff again). Someone would say that new systems are tougher and perhaps unbreakable(but i dont think so as i explained above). I invite a cracker to state his opinion about his matter here(or in another post if he thinks suitable) and/or explain why the this systems are so tough to be cracked, the differences with older systems and the exaxt spot that he/she finds difficulties, even post related assembly code. Some of us would listen and undestand or even be able to help. But i think thats just not the case. Imo, the case is that most people are confortable with that new way since they just want their games to play in their personal computer at home and they dont care furthermore. Am I correct? Someone with knowledge in the matter answer me plz.
__________________
:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 04-12-2005, 03:51
Papio Papio is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Papio is on a distinguished road
Not a cracker but I know at least one reason why images/mini images are better

Patch-ability, take your example "Civ 4" was so riddled with bugs at pre-patch a huge amount of players experienced a CTD at least once an hour. (if they could play at all)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2005, 00:42
renhoekNL renhoekNL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
renhoekNL is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aristarchus
why do people want to make their lives harder with all that images, programs that work only in MS windows systems and stuff? Have all the crackers like deviance died or been been arrested or something?
1) fixing images is easier then cracking exe's
2) patchability as previous poster pointed out

And it should not be too hard to fix up mount's loopback code to include .mds functionality if you're trying to run games under linux. Ofcourse the 'security module' might trip on linux itself instead of only the dvd encryption bit.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Errors Errors Question boysrus PSX Games 3 24-03-2002 08:58
differente version of securom ???? (packer) bidule PC Games 2 07-03-2002 02:53
[Help! - Removing the Securom protection...] XICO2KX CD/DVD Copy Protections & Utilities 1 19-12-2001 19:16
PHILIPS STILL KILLING SD2 AND SONY HANDLING SECUROM 1&2 Redrum1 PC Games 2 26-02-2001 14:39
errors, errors, errors, damn that discjuggler sucks; help me pleeeeeezzz !! fari DC Games 3 14-12-2000 12:38



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:58.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
FileForums @ https://fileforums.com