|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Are you using the original disc or a NoCD crack?
__________________
Can't find a Game Conversion? Check the 'Conversion INDEX'
![]() |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm using the original CD, Brand new, bought from a retailer yesterday.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The reason for the original question is that on the box it says system requirements are PentiumIII 800mhz - but I didn't notice until I had got it home. I thought it said PentiumII 800mhz
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
To be honest I dont know much about the AMD machines as I have always owned Intel machines but I cant see your system being the reason for the "Insert original Disc" message?
Go here and you will find a NoCD crack for your game. Try it and see if it will get you past the CD Check.
__________________
Can't find a Game Conversion? Check the 'Conversion INDEX'
![]() Last edited by Grumpy; 10-09-2005 at 10:07. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
that AMD system is equal to a Pen 4 2.4 533 setup
your system should have no problems running B.O.B. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
That doesnt equal that at all.
AMD chips will outclass high end P4's. Its well documented on several sites. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
a 2400+ is supposed to be a pen4 2.4 ghz setup
thats what 2400+ means same as a 3500+ that means it should be equal to a pen4 3.5 (granted they don't make a pen4 3.5) but thats what it should equal out to as far as outclassing Intel when it comes to doing mulitple tasks at hand...Intel is better for gaming AMD is better both have there positives and negatives |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Battle of Britain 2 (UK) | BarryB | PC Games - Protection List | 0 | 08-09-2005 16:03 |
| Battle of Britain patch | neilgra | PC Games | 2 | 03-06-2001 02:43 |
| Battle Of Britain............ | RoBoCop555 | PC Games | 0 | 30-01-2001 12:15 |
| Battle of britain no cd | Von | PC Games | 0 | 20-12-2000 03:51 |
| battle of britain | Von | PC Games | 0 | 17-12-2000 17:07 |