 |
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: true? | |||
| definetly |
   
|
1 | 50.00% |
| possibly |
  
|
1 | 50.00% |
| unsure |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| no way ! |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 2. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| |
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: true? | |||
| definetly |
|
1 | 50.00% |
| possibly |
|
1 | 50.00% |
| unsure |
|
0 | 0% |
| no way ! |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 2. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
27-10-2003, 22:58
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ok, I understand that the companies want to protect their stuff, but using a copyprotection that pisses the consumer off when it's not working properly is like putting a gun to your head and pull the trigger...so far I haven't seen a protection that remains uncracked..
Nothing beats an original, but I don't want to install 50 million patches/fixes to get the damn thing going.
__________________
The gateway is open and you're all coming with me..... |
| Sponsored Links |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
