|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
The subtleties of PIO and (U)DMA are WAY beyond my scope
, but this I have read: "[...] DMA gives you CRC checking for data going over the IDE cable while PIO does not" In other words, DMA is better if error-correction is what U want. Besides, just because data goes though CPU doesn't mean PIO is more precise - CD-reader/burner accuracy still remains the same... Furthermore, using PIO during a burning session implies putting more strain on CPU - this would tend to reduce data flow to the writer, causing buffer level to drop and burn-proof to activate, thereby seriously slowing down the writing process. Hope this helps... |
|
|