Ch now rip Sicheats Trainers?

[Joe Forster/STA]

Originally Posted by Desu[Shield]

It is, however, a true statement as you are making a statement and demanding the opposing property provide proof of their innocence (the very definition of Argumentum ad Ignorantiam). It works the other way in that you must prove the opposing party is guilty with evidence that shows without any form of doubt.

Have you been in a cave during the CheatHappens vs. h4x0r war?! CheatHappens - and their agents, fans, whatever - did the very same things: unfounded, vague accusations, without any actual proofs. Read our announcements and learn!

Originally Posted by Desu[Shield]

Also why would someone send in code to a website that is heavily biased in your favor?

Not biased in h4x0r's favor; biased against h4x0r's "enemies". If you don't understand the difference, remember that "the enemy of our enemy is our friend". And, since you're so fuckin' educated about logic, let me add this, too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_excluded_middle.

Originally Posted by cocodrilo

My trainer is public released for free, anyone can download and inspect.

Then there's no need for us to compare the two trainers as anyone can do that anyway. And that includes trainer coders, too, which I am not.

Originally Posted by Desu[Shield]

Posting the algorithms is high sensitive information.

Reminds me of this case: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACS_en...ey_controversy.

Originally Posted by Desu[Shield]

From what I've seen from previous topics, Joe is extremely biased against Cheat Happens and favors your work a lot better (and there is no guarantee that he would not slip information to you for your own use).

I don't remember of having ever used a CheatHappens or Sicheats trainer so I can't favor either side's work at all. By the way, the bold part is a shameless argumentum ad hominem: you're trying to belittle and discredit the other side, without any actual proofs. You yourself are using the logical somersaults that you're condemning the other side of. Conclusion: fuck off!

@CalFromCH: Permbanned for your obscene name-calling. Take your filthy mind elsewhere!

Originally Posted by PWizFromCH

BTW Joe, for a site that despises us so much, we sure do manage to monopolize your forums around here.

Which shows what you've been trying to deny all the time: that we're trying to remain impartial. (Which does not include letting people call us like Caliber does - another example of argumentum ad hominem -, at such an unacceptable level of disrespect that we never used against you. Shorten his leash!)

You remind of the Hungarian "Socialist" Party (not leftist: they have nothing to do with socialism, they're the local executors of international plutocracy) crying around that free speech is being banned by the national (rightist) government's allegedly dictatorial laws... and they do that in the Hungarian press. This really helps with their/your authenticity, doesn't it? Talk about an own goal.

Good that you mentioned despising: I think I should pity you instead...

Originally Posted by CalFromCH

the 'detectives' (...) have no grasp of communication, so i cannot even tell what the fuck they are talking about half the time.

Or - there are two sides of the coin! - your intellect is too low to grasp the logical jumps I make. (By the way, yet another argumentum ad hominem. Wait, already two: mine is also one!)

Originally Posted by CalFromCH

i think you can lock this one and put it away for posterity

Oh, you can bet we're gonna keep this as yet another memento! When the tide turns, I'm sure you'll regret and will want to take back some/most of whatever you've said here but that will be your problem, not ours.

As both parties dissected their own trainers, there's not much more to be said. Thread closed, we let readers make their own opinions.