|
I think HALAC would be better. It outperforms all available lossless wav-packer algorithms. (in speed)
Compression ratio only a bit worse than others.
Real life example ,but it obviously depends on the source.
1.wav 58,245,620
1.flac 42,758,413 (max. compression)
1.tak 42,214,646
1.tta 42,339,162
1.halac 43,003,837
HALAC's compression time : 0.8 sec on Ryzen 7 9700x ,single thread.
Disadvantages : It has no stdio and stream processing feature.
Available at encode dot su ,look for Hakan Abbas.
Last edited by shazzla; 05-03-2026 at 02:00.
|