The result seems to be obvious ...
pzlib+srep64+zcm
Code:
-↓- [ CMD Bench.Test.Info v0.6.9c ] -↓- Compressed Archive Completed At -↓- 18/11/2016 13:06:20
=============================================================================================================================================
○ [ ALGORITHM ] ○ [ INPUT SIZE ] ○ [ OUTPUT SIZE ] ○ [ RATIO.% ] ○ [ ARCHIVED FILES ] ○ [ COMP.TIME ] ○ [ SYNTAX - OPTIONS - ARGUMENTS ] ○
Arc 981,1°MB 453,2°MB 46,19% 1°Files 00:11:11:329 a -ma9 -ds -lc1024 -ld1024 -ep1 -di -i2 -ed -r -s; -w"temp" -mpzlib+srep64+zcm
=============================================================================================================================================
srep64+pzlib+zcm
Code:
-↓- [ CMD Bench.Test.Info v0.6.9c ] -↓- Compressed Archive Completed At -↓- 18/11/2016 13:18:14
=============================================================================================================================================
○ [ ALGORITHM ] ○ [ INPUT SIZE ] ○ [ OUTPUT SIZE ] ○ [ RATIO.% ] ○ [ ARCHIVED FILES ] ○ [ COMP.TIME ] ○ [ SYNTAX - OPTIONS - ARGUMENTS ] ○
Arc 981,1°MB 693,5°MB 70,69% 1°Files 00:10:52:408 a -ma9 -ds -lc1024 -ld1024 -ep1 -di -i2 -ed -r -s; -w"temp" -msrep64+pzlib+zcm
=============================================================================================================================================
I do not understand what benefits or on what files with pzlib support, should be inserted the "pzlib" pre-compressor at second reading in a concatenated method ...
