View Single Post
  #14  
Old 17-01-2016, 05:07
panker1992's Avatar
panker1992 panker1992 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Always Somewhere
Posts: 565
Thanks: 116
Thanked 882 Times in 320 Posts
panker1992 is on a distinguished road
TEST SAMPLE 1 = 100mb of random Photos

Precomp 0.45 x86 optimized build
Install Started - 14:44:37.31
Install Finished - 14:45:42.12
Total = 65 seconds
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Precomp 0.45 x64 optimized build
Install Started - 14:46:38.97
Install Finished - 14:47:38.42
Total = 60 seconds

Approx speed comparison x64 was 9,2% faster
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Precomp 0.44 original Build
Install Started - 14:50:05.75
Install Finished - 14:51:09.70
Total = 64 seconds

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
TEST SAMPLE 1 = 115mb of 7z files
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Precomp 0.44 original Build
Install Started - 14:54:18.04
Install Finished - 14:55:01.72
Total = 43 seconds
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Precomp 0.45 x64 optimized build
Install Started - 14:55:59.44
Install Finished - 14:56:42.13
Total = 43 seconds
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Precomp 0.45 x86 optimized build
Install Started - 14:59:31.22
Install Finished - 15:00:15.10
Total = 44 seconds

Seems we have a winer

Method used was same on those 2 test samples, -mprecomp+srep+xz

i made this for you Felice please read this carefully and let me know what you think

i had some time today so i tested the precomp 0.45
__________________
My projects : Masked Compression, lzma2(xz) on Freearc, Zstd compressor for windows
My optimizations : packjpg.exe, zstd, lzham, precomp-dev-0.45.

Last edited by panker1992; 17-01-2016 at 05:09.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to panker1992 For This Useful Post:
lolaya (17-01-2016)