View Single Post
  #33  
Old 04-12-2015, 09:39
panker1992's Avatar
panker1992 panker1992 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Always Somewhere
Posts: 566
Thanks: 116
Thanked 889 Times in 321 Posts
panker1992 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by felice2011 View Post
Friends you do your choices, I'm happy to update my utility just as you wish, and it however you like.
Panker do not look at only the speed, but also the compression level of the various methods, we must try to find a balance in both, to satisfy everyone.
This is why i chose zstd ...because it features advanced API that can compress decent.

To be more specific zstd has at least 30% ~ 35% better compression ratio
tho everyone i see use my original -8 switch ....it can easily go as high as -20 but its ratio doesnt compare to lzma at all :P

All in all zstd gives 30% ~ 35% better compression AND it decompressed as fast as lz4

HINT : zstd and all tools i use have porpose nothing i choose is coincidence this all is part of my upcoming big project call "Masked Compression"

soon !!!
__________________
My projects : Masked Compression, lzma2(xz) on Freearc, Zstd compressor for windows
My optimizations : packjpg.exe, zstd, lzham, precomp-dev-0.45.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to panker1992 For This Useful Post:
RamiroCruzo (04-12-2015)