Quote:
|
How is two time stamps definitive proof? If Microsoft Office releases their next product 1 hour later than LibreOffice releases their next product then Microsoft has copied code directly from LibreOffice?
|
in my first post:
Quote:
|
with the same options, is really suspicious. it appears shortly after publishing the second version in SC.
|
suspicious != definitive proof
please read the previous post. the claim is simply, third request:
Do you have any problem to show your code to joe?.
Quote:
|
Also why would someone send in code to a website that is heavily biased in your favor? Not only that but you requested it to be copied and pasted directly in public domain (a message forum post). How willing are you to do that with your own source code? Not likely at all.
|
My trainer is public released for free, anyone can download and inspect.
can you make a public version to see if there is something similar in your trainer?. sc trainer is public to anyone. feel free to download and decompile it. isn't crypted or compressed.
in many post only rejects the show something.
More simply:
1 : ¿what offset or pattern uses your trainer?
2: ¿any particular reason for this address? please explain.