Quote:
actualy CaliPer  , i would very well imagine brewers doesnt give a shit about you and your opinions at any time of the day, so why dont you mosey off back to cheathappens and take your bullshit False Flag propaganda back with you 
|
i have nothing against veggie and brewers. he is a great trainer maker and reverser. but what i am saying is proven and i have the info to back it up. i didn't put anything about CH or telling this user here to use other trainers, just telling him why it won't work (likely) on his machine.
this is the scan from the brewers.dll:
http://virusscan.jotti.org/en/scanre...97336991967a08
FYI here is veg's response:
"First off all the trainer isn't flagged by NOD32 nor by Kaspersky. Been tested by several people with different AV software on different OS. Like you said I would not throw out a non working trainer although to me it looks like that is what you are wishing for a non working trainer from veggy himself. Especially making a whole topic on a popular gamehacking board just about my trainer while you could have sended me a PM. It's all about the usual bullshit cheathappens likes to throw out.
I am not going to test the trainer on every freaking Anti Virus Software. In the past the AV makers added our trainer to their databases as a threath.
We don't care they did that and neither will fight to get them out of their database.
The obfuscation is there for a reason, you have figured out why. Obfuscating the code will let the code run through a virtual machine, meaning the actual opcodes the CPU uses are changed to Machine code. Yeah you can break the DLL and figure out where the cave is and than the fun starts no offsets can easily be sniffed out, the main reason I have obfuscated the code."
i talked to veg directly in gamehacking about this, but he didn't seem to care about it. it might not be flagged by the two scans he tried (at the time), but you can see that it is flagged by several others. all his obfuscation is doing is making an otherwise simple trainer program less likely to work for more people who could give a damn about reversing it (like this user here). if he wants to ignore this, then it's up to him. don't take my word for it, catch the .dll when it is produced and send it to jotti yourself.
as a side note, why all the harshness apache?
best,
Cal