Quote:
Originally Posted by instant
Just because you disagree with something does not make the statement silly.
It all depends on the quality of the tutorial and what skill level the reader has beforehand. I still believe that a reader who has access to both tutorials and a rich environment of source code will be able to more easily discover implementations and methods of doing trainers.
Have not read any tutorials on this forum, but from other forums I would say that some of them have been somewhat lacking for me to get a clear understanding of them... or written "hastily" so they are only usefull to a very limited number of people who have the patience to read Ghetto-speak or are already familiar with the material being discussed.
I am sure CH would still make money even if they opensourced their trainers. As they are the biggest and most organized cheat site on the internets, and most people will not code a trainer even if they are given the source. The only risk that could happen is that people who copy trainers and present them as their own work would have an easier job at it. But giving them the full source would perhaps give them enough information so they would be able to make their own trainers, or interest them in such.
Additionally, from other 'scenes' the objective has always to be FIRST (and sometimes with QUALITY). If someone copies a low option trainer and release it much later, what loss is there in terms of creds..
I'd think that anyone who is a user here are not downloading trainers from CH (because of the membership stuff) and CH users hardly visit GCW because it is part of another 'internet' (i.e. the non subscription based one...)
|
I just have to say a big
NO to that.
If you cant follow some tutorials out there then you would never understand period.
It also depends of course on the level of the tutorial, only knowing a smattering (basic knowledge) of ASM and jumping into something like injecting your own DLL's etc then it will go way over your head.
Looking at source code will not help you understand the ideas or knowledge behind what your looking at, only how in lamens terms that particular source will work, so in a way your only learning in the region of 5-10% of what you should know to fully understand.
I can tell you GCW is talked alot at CH, people sending people here to get cracks for games and so forth, so im assuming quite a handful of CH paid customers actually may come here, perhaps not to the forum but to GCW anyway.
Anyways, In short, if you wanna learn what there is to learn, then Learn it dont as TippeX said be spoonfed the information as that will not learn you anything.