View Single Post
  #2  
Old 24-08-2003, 18:40
IceBreaker's Avatar
IceBreaker IceBreaker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UNKNOWN TO MORTALS
Posts: 169
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
IceBreaker
The subtleties of PIO and (U)DMA are WAY beyond my scope , but this I have read:

"[...] DMA gives you CRC checking for data going over the IDE cable while PIO does not"

In other words, DMA is better if error-correction is what U want.

Besides, just because data goes though CPU doesn't mean PIO is more precise - CD-reader/burner accuracy still remains the same...

Furthermore, using PIO during a burning session implies putting more strain on CPU - this would tend to reduce data flow to the writer, causing buffer level to drop and burn-proof to activate, thereby seriously slowing down the writing process.

Hope this helps...
Reply With Quote