Bomberman Collection PC - Patch ??
 

hi, i bought this game that came out for the PC, Bomberman Collection . I tried serching all over for a patch so i wont need the cd to play it, wondering if anyone has seen a patch around for this game ? Thanks

id really be surprised if it had anything else than cdcheks on it...

I did back it up, and it does install , then at the main menu when chosing which game to play it doesnt load up. Guess it does have cd-checking on it, would there be a way to by-pass it

u could try running protection id on it, and then set the settings on alcohol, that should hopefully give u a 1:1 copy :)

i used cloneyxxl to detect the protection , i received SecuROM *new* V 4.84.00.0019 , used Alcohol under the secuROM new v.4/5 , when it was done the cd title is named NEEDS EMULATION , seems very simular to the CS Condition Zero situation. Im guessing only way would be a no cd patch to back it up.

weird..

There's nothing "weird" about it as the game is protected by SecuROM like all of Konami's previous titles.

Luciel, did you ever think of not responding to a post when you don't actually have the game and therefore don't know what kind of protection it has? I doubt the poster cares for your blind guess about the game. I know I wouldn't.

As for a crack, one does exist, but no one ever sent it to GameCopyWorld.

yeah well u see the difference between u and me, is that im here to try help other people wether i own the game or not, so if ur just gonna critize me, then just dont bother posting, cos frankly, i dont care.

Giving out false information like yours doesn't help. It hurts by misleading and can discourage others who actually know what they are talking about from responding if they just look quickly and see that someone has already posted.

I didn't just criticize you. I also gave some useful information to the original poster.

Don't spam the forum. If you know the answer, post but otherwise leave it to those who do know.

watever mister know it all.

Pipe down a bit, E_J. Luciel did exactly what he was supposed to do, which is recommending protectionId or another tool to ID the protection used and working from that. I can find nothing wrong with Luciels posts here but I do mind your senseless criticism. Try to be a little more constructive next time.

So you encourage misinformed posts?

He didn't do that in his first post which he should have if he felt compelled to respond about a game he had never tried.

My posts were constructive including constructive criticism of Luciel's misleading posts. He should not be so quick to spam the board when he doesn't have the game in question.