FileForums - XLolz - Lolz Accelerator

Page 1 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

FileForums (https://fileforums.com/index.php)

- Conversion Tutorials (https://fileforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=55)

- - XLolz - Lolz Accelerator (https://fileforums.com/showthread.php?t=103849)

BLACKFIRE69

01-10-2020 03:13

XLolz - Lolz Accelerator

1 Attachment(s)

XLolz - Lolz Accelerator

Lolz (Tested on lolz v22c4b) Accelerator (MultiThreaded).

Commands:
a = Compress
x = Decompress

Options:
-c# = Chunk Size [Compression Only]
-t# = Threads (as a number or as a percentage)

Usage:
XLolz.exe a -c# -t# -method - - <stdin> <stdout>
XLolz.exe x -t# - - <stdin> <stdout>

Arc.ini:

Code:

[External compressor:XLolz]

header = 0

packcmd   = XLolz.exe a -c64m -t100p - - <stdin> <stdout>

unpackcmd = XLolz.exe x -t4 - - <stdin> <stdout>

For Compression:
arc.ini
XLolz.exe
XLolz.ini
lolz_x64.exe

For Decompression:
arc.ini
CLS.ini
XLolz.exe
lolz_x64_u.exe

https://i.imgur.com/Un00OXF.png
https://i.imgur.com/rNmHML0.png

thanks @Balaji007 for the idea.

* note: you must have enough RAM.

dixen

01-10-2020 04:59

Test

With Accelerator

Quote:

Compressed 2 files, 178,957,280 => 53,612,177 bytes. Ratio 29.96%
Compression time: cpu 0.20 sec/real 236.98 sec = 0%. Speed 0.76 mB/s
All OK

Without Accelerator

Quote:

Compressed 2 files, 178,957,280 => 53,591,715 bytes. Ratio 29.95%
Compression time: cpu 0.20 sec/real 395.72 sec = 0%. Speed 0.45 mB/s
All OK

FitGirl

01-10-2020 13:51

But... why? On decompression it will use more memory, than native lolz.

BLACKFIRE69

01-10-2020 18:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by FitGirl (Post 488105)

But... why? On decompression it will use more memory, than native lolz.

I think it can be controlled by changing the number of threads for decompression.

Balaji007

02-10-2020 04:53

Xlolz works perfectly 😂

I was tested your xlolz with on low end pc(4 Gb Ram, 4 thread pc). The compression and decompression was worked well.I was compressed 1.36 Gb file into 1.04 Gb. Native lolz was gave the same result (Approximately). Also decompression was taken only 3 minutes.

Cesar82

02-10-2020 19:20

Is it not possible to add this LOLZ acceleration to MTX.exe?
If possible, list (names only) the methods supported in the MTX.exe thread.

darkwolves

02-10-2020 21:17

using lolz in the past it would not multithread for me i dunno if it was because of my hardware or what..
but this enables me to

Masquerade

03-10-2020 04:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkwolves (Post 488122)

using lolz in the past it would not multithread for me i dunno if it was because of my hardware or what..

Did you toggle multi threads?

Code:

--------------------------- multithreading settings --------------------------

 mt type(-mtt[0..1]): 0

 mt threads(-mt[1..16]): 1               mt block size MB(-mtb[2..512]): 2m

-mtt1 -mmt6

BLACKFIRE69

03-10-2020 05:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cesar82 (Post 488121)

Is it not possible to add this LOLZ acceleration to MTX.exe?
If possible, list (names only) the methods supported in the MTX.exe thread.

yep.it's possible.
Mtx.exe supports many methods that doesn't support STDIO.

Balaji007

03-10-2020 07:19

For low end pc users:
Reduce the chunk size(Under 32 Mb) to operate in low end pc. But it didn't affect the compression ratio. Also It was gave higher decompression speed. Xlolz only for low end pc users��

darkwolves

03-10-2020 10:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by Masquerade (Post 488125)

Did you toggle multi threads?

Code:

--------------------------- multithreading settings --------------------------

 mt type(-mtt[0..1]): 0

 mt threads(-mt[1..16]): 1               mt block size MB(-mtb[2..512]): 2m

-mtt1 -mmt6

i did all that it never multithreaded..
i tried many things that were suggested to me none worked

Balaji007

03-10-2020 11:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkwolves (Post 488134)

i did all that it never multithreaded..
i tried many things that were suggested to me none worked

Use this xlolz and reduce the chunk size

darkwolves

03-10-2020 11:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Balaji007 (Post 488135)

Use this xlolz and reduce the chunk size

i already did and it worked very well but i didn't have to reduce chunk size :D

Balaji007

03-10-2020 17:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by darkwolves (Post 488137)

i already did and it worked very well but i didn't have to reduce chunk size :D

Lol, ok 😂

PsYcHo_RaGE

04-10-2020 07:05

what's up with the "x" word? @BLACKFIRE69

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:28.

Page 1 of 2

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page