![]() |
BCM Accelerator - BcmX
BCM Accelerator - BcmX 2 A tool for Accelerate the BCM. (for BCM v1.51). https://i.imgur.com/PSC4pCh.png Commands: a = Compress Options: -c # = chunk size -b # = block size (1 to 9 : set block size in 1 MB to 2 GB) Usage: BcmX.exe a -c# -b#- - <stdin> <stdout> Arc.ini: Code:
[External compressor:bcmx]BcmX.exe bcm32.exe bcm64.exe For Decompression: cls.ini cls-bcmx.dll cls-bcm_x64.exe cls-bcm_x86.exe Testing: https://i.imgur.com/y6BLpoe.png |
What is bcm exactly? Any info?
|
Quote:
Code:
https://github.com/encode84/bcm |
Quote:
|
Afaik its bwt based.
|
How does BCM shape up against lolz/rz? Do you have any comparisons?
|
Both of them are better in many case.
|
Bcmx 2 New Update
BCM Accelerator - BcmX 2 New Update Commands: a = Compress Options: -c # = chunk size -b # = block size (1 to 9 : set block size in 1 MB to 2 GB) Usage: BcmX.exe a -c# -b#- - <stdin> <stdout> Arc.ini: Code:
[External compressor:bcmx]BcmX.exe bcm32.exe bcm64.exe For Decompression: cls.ini cls-bcmx.dll cls-bcm_x64.exe cls-bcm_x86.exe check the first post.... |
Very good,thanks!
But i have to ask and sorry for my noob question: What is the correlation between chunk size and block size? It is not clear for me... |
Quote:
You can always set block size to 9 for better compression, because still we using chunk size is about 64mb |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Ohh. Right. It was a dumb question. Sorry.
|
Quote:
|
@BLACKFIRE69
Hi friend, BCMX works perfectly to compare other compression tools. But it was gave a bad results in PAK files. Why it was happen? But it was worked perfectly another type files. For an example: I was compressed x.pak(21 Gb), Output was 9.77 Gb and also i was tried with xz or razor or lolz given nearly 8.9 Gb. |
Quote:
try again after changing the parameters (-b). and also change the chunk size (64m, 128m, ...). |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 21:29. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
FileForums @ https://fileforums.com