![]() |
Possible fix for srep64 v393a data corruption - need more testing
1 Attachment(s)
Here is a recompiled srep64 with latest gcc/msys2 and eased compiler flags that *maybe* solved data corruption during compression when computer is under heavy load. To understand the issue better start reading from here:
https://encode.ru/threads/231-FreeAr...ll=1#post56416 If you had same(exactly same not other) issue with latest srep393a through exe/stdio(dont know about cls), and whether this solved the problem or not please let me know. |
what is the difference between (srep64_generic_sse2) and (srep64_haswell)??
|
Quote:
AMD = Generic, Intel = Haswell; |
haswell = -march=native (I have 4690k) (this will not work on lower cpu than haswell series and maybe even higher not - like amd perhaps)
generic = -mtune=native -msse2 (this will work on any x64 cpu with sse2) |
Unfortunately, issue still remain, albeit it does seems to me occurrence is less frequent. This night I packed another 17g data, one with srep+xnlz and another with srep+lolz. First one tested without error but on another one I got srep error again. Therefore, I consider this issue NOT fixed. Please ignore this thread/links for now unlit real 100% solution is found. I read elsewhere that increasing srep's block size may help so I will try that for some period and see.
|
Just a quick note, last night I tried to pack ~30gb again, I used standard shipped exe not the one self-recompiled I posted here. However this time I tried with acceleration disabled: a0. And it did packed properly. I will post again after some time and more data tests on whether this option really solved the problem or not.(Btw increasing block size did not.)
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:07. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
FileForums @ https://fileforums.com