FileForums

FileForums (https://fileforums.com/index.php)
-   CD/DVD Copy Protections & Utilities (https://fileforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Daemon Tools 4 (https://fileforums.com/showthread.php?t=73546)

rats 14-11-2005 11:54

Daemon Tools 4
 
Even though it's not released on the homepage ( http://www.daemon-tools.cc/dtcc/announcements.php ) daemon tools 4 is here. I, for one, didn't find anything noticeable (maybe because i didn't look into it that much), but some people say it can emulate starforce 3.x (or at least the Pro version that's soon to apear)... more detailes soon, i guess...

BarryB 14-11-2005 13:13

Are you a Professional Time Waster?

prollfin 14-11-2005 13:20

He must be one. I can't see anything like a release on their site... Plus, one of the DT guys said it's coming this week but NOT on monday...

prollfin 14-11-2005 13:58

Okay, seems like I was wrong. 4.00 is out now.

crypto6600 14-11-2005 14:13

hello , go download dt4 and it does emulates SF at this post :

http://fileforums.com/showthread.php...105#post301105

TippeX 14-11-2005 16:32

if you read the info on their site you'll see that it isnt the revolutionary 4.0 that everyone is waiting for, new redesign, some adware added (user can opt to install it), ide jammer is not present, nor is 64 bit driver support, so its the same old **** in a different box, disappointing really because i paid to register it thinking it would be good, then came the 14 day delay after their much anticipated october 'deadline'... now im beginning to think i wasted my money on vaporware, i shall wait and see but for now i think their 'news' and 'release' are very very lacking...:mad:

as for emulating starforce, didnt the old daemon tools do the same with ide drives disconnected?

hyakkii 14-11-2005 17:59

yes very disappointing for a program thats been in development for so long. Hopefully the pro version will be somewhat better if it ever gets released takes that team years just to put one change in

Machina 14-11-2005 20:01

So what in the world did they change in this release...It seems like 3.47 with some blacklisting fixes.

DUKE_NUKEM 14-11-2005 22:42

On the official site they say that DT4 works if no IDE Drive is connected or IDE-NODES are disabled. I wonder if disabling nodes via SFNightmare and then mounting game images onto DT4 virtual device will finally work with SF protected games. Does anyone have tried this way??? If it works without phisically unplugging drives, it would be a great thing anyway....

Favaro 14-11-2005 23:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by DUKE_NUKEM
On the official site they say that DT4 works if no IDE Drive is connected or IDE-NODES are disabled. I wonder if disabling nodes via SFNightmare and then mounting game images onto DT4 virtual device will finally work with SF protected games. Does anyone have tried this way??? If it works without phisically unplugging drives, it would be a great thing anyway....


Yes i was able to get trackmania sunrise and splintercell chaos theory to work. I was also able to get fear ver 1.2 to work without the original disk in the drive. I made sure all emulation options were on in daemond tools 4 then disabled drives and rebooted. Game loaded no prob without disk.

DABhand 15-11-2005 02:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by TippeX
if you read the info on their site you'll see that it isnt the revolutionary 4.0 that everyone is waiting for, new redesign, some adware added (user can opt to install it), ide jammer is not present, nor is 64 bit driver support, so its the same old **** in a different box, disappointing really because i paid to register it thinking it would be good, then came the 14 day delay after their much anticipated october 'deadline'... now im beginning to think i wasted my money on vaporware, i shall wait and see but for now i think their 'news' and 'release' are very very lacking...:mad:

as for emulating starforce, didnt the old daemon tools do the same with ide drives disconnected?


Dude you know better than to throw your money about to soon ;)

Nothing is guarenteed, id rather wait than be one of the first. If you know what I mean ;)

DUKE_NUKEM 15-11-2005 02:33

Favaro I'm happy for ya but I'd like to know if you need to uninstall alcohol or daemon tools prevents also alcohol's virtual device from blacklisting.
Oh, just one thing:are we sure that the problem is make sf games backup work? I think the REAL problem is that SF virus installs silently and damages hardware and software, so I would be satisfied if there were a possibility to play WITHOUT installing SF drivers. Bypassing the protection is not a good solution , if the protection itself is dangerous for the system. For me, the only way to go is to keep boycotting sf games, even if we are now able to play some of them from backups.

Favaro 15-11-2005 03:05

Well duke i never had alcohol installed and it worked fine. But decided to install it to test it out. Now it doesnt work. Even after installing it i cant get it to work. Oh well.

I had daemon tools installed of course because i was mounting the images with it. As for starforce drivers ive never had a prob with it damaging my hardware or software.

DABhand 15-11-2005 03:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by DUKE_NUKEM
Favaro I'm happy for ya but I'd like to know if you need to uninstall alcohol or daemon tools prevents also alcohol's virtual device from blacklisting.
Oh, just one thing:are we sure that the problem is make sf games backup work? I think the REAL problem is that SF virus installs silently and damages hardware and software, so I would be satisfied if there were a possibility to play WITHOUT installing SF drivers. Bypassing the protection is not a good solution , if the protection itself is dangerous for the system. For me, the only way to go is to keep boycotting sf games, even if we are now able to play some of them from backups.


Jeesus PEOPLE!


Starforce is NOT designed to ruin hardware..

It does benchmark drives, and if your drives are faulty or old it could cause them to fail.

It is NOT a virus..

It does NOT kill legal software..


See all it takes is one person to say "OMG my Drive is dead, it must have been SF", then everyone jumps on the same band waggon. With new and more interesting stories..


As usual people follow the leader :rolleyes:

Joe Forster/STA 15-11-2005 03:42

@DABhand: I suggest you read my little story at http://fileforums.com/showthread.php...e=6#post299123 .

hyakkii 15-11-2005 03:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by DABhand
Jeesus PEOPLE!


Starforce is NOT designed to ruin hardware..

It does benchmark drives, and if your drives are faulty or old it could cause them to fail.

It is NOT a virus..

It does NOT kill legal software..


See all it takes is one person to say "OMG my Drive is dead, it must have been SF", then everyone jumps on the same band waggon. With new and more interesting stories..


As usual people follow the leader :rolleyes:

Actully you are wrong starforce can mess up a system more then 10 virus's it personally corrupted my whole raid 5 array when sf 3 first came out i had to pay for data recovery (cost a ton) drives / motherboard and cables were fine after i had all my data on dvds from ontrack I decided to give it a go again i setup a temp array with very clean install of windows i installed chipset drivers / video / sound and network (raid drivers were installed on windows install from F6) ... then i installed the accused game that had the starforce protection and had a few debugers running after the drivers were install the data curuption started immediate i had logs and logs of proof turns out i couldn't sue starforce and / or ubisoft i instead had them reproduce the problem and they found out it was there drivers causing the conflict with my raid drivers....anyways i was very pissed and didnt get one penny from them for data recovery when they admited it was their fault and said it would be fixed in a update..

anyways long story short took that pos game back after explaining it to the store they allowed it and i will NEVER buy a starforce protected game ever again.

I think anyone is a fool who allows these companys to take advantage of the customers with this particular protection and by supporting it you will just make it get worse, for example now "root kits" are coming out they install and intercept kernel calls and can hide predefined directorys (full story here http://www.sysinternals.com/blog/200...al-rights.html )

pretty soon there will be tons of these malicious mailware / root kits / drivers / hidden drivers / DRM license keys / that no system will be able to run stable or run the paticular software in the future, take a close look at starforce it blacklists all scsi devices thinking they are emulators (that would include most sata) , in the future cdroms might just be sata and these game wouldnt even work without maybe downloading 100's of megs in patches to maybe get it working (if the company even supports it anymore). and its a dirty protection takes more time getting it to "work" then you can spend enjoying the game you just spent you hard earned money on. email tech support they give you the run around say its starforce contact them or starforce says its ubisofts fault.

It is a virus basically it install drivers (3+) (not to mention it doesn't inform users of installing them yes when you click on the game exe it says protection system but doesnt give you any choice not to install it as soon as the game exe is run they are installed) they run in the backgound regardless of the game being installed or running they can modify packets being written to a cd/dvd recorder if it thinks you'r copying a protected cd (this goes to show the protection goes farther then just the game protection) it can cause numerous of other flaws too like general system instability online reporting (spyware) or data curuption

There is plenty of proof out there that starforce is a shady protection using "holes" in windows and other bugs and can cause numerous security flaws. Good for you if you don't have any problems but when you do with a system upgrade or whatever remember what you posted.

Its gotten so bad im afraid to pre-order a game since i don't know what protection system it will be using :(

Favaro 15-11-2005 03:56

Well i got trackmania sunrise to work again by disabling the cdrom drives again with sf nightmare even tho they were already disabled. Weird. But as for splinter cell it still dont work. I might try it on other system that hasnt got alcohol installed & see how it goes. But not today

DUKE_NUKEM 15-11-2005 03:57

Sorry DabHand but don't ya think that is "drivers are faulty" and
starforce "causes them to fail", all this could damage your hardware?!? Drivers are made to make hardware work correctly, I don't like the idea of "something" interfering with them. Again, it's neither a single person nor a leader which makes me think that starforce is dangerous; a lot of people exprienced problems after installing sf protected games; only who used warez\cracked version avoided to install starforce on his system; I don't mind if a game is must buy, masterpiece or whatever, I basically want to stay away from probs and keep thinkin' that cutting prices should be the way to go, not causing problem ESPECIALLY to legal copy owners.
Finally, as I don't have money to waste in games which could damage my system, I'd like to know experiences from other users; it's not a mere "follow the leader", it's just trying to get some advice. :o

DABhand 15-11-2005 04:05

I myself have a raid system running. And ive been using SF games for quite a while now, once I had a problem with a CD being not recognised, other than that ive had no problem, and that one problem I contacted SF about it and they gave me a fix for it, not a problem.


Infact they will help you, if you ask them nicely, they arent the bad guys, they are trying to make a product that stops piracy and doing a good job at it.


Again they give support, but only to genuine users, on their forum you see countless warez users trying to get support but always fall at the first hurdle when they cant provide a genuine key or system information (always missing the important bits out).


Im not saying all people here are warez users, but most are, there is no doubt in that, and its the warez users who are offcourse finding it hard, so when they seen Grumpy's good thread about it, most of them make up the stories and add to it (again not all of them).


When SF starts it authenicates a disc, and that means benchmarking your drive, if your drive's life is about to give way it could cause the drive to die.

Warez users will have more complications, as that is what the protection is designed for to discourage warez issues.


Im just fed up seeing the same excuse each time "SF did this and that" when it could be the simple fact that drives or hardware were dying or were faulty. So immediately they blame SF. Why not Safedisc why not Securom? They do the same thing now. Each place a system file which resides in the windows folder and keeps watch.


If you got alot of genuine SF users and asked how much problems they had, you would probably find a huge amount of them have had no problems. Like everything nothing is 100% and PC hardware isnt generic like consoles, so there will be cases of incompatibility.

All im saying is, look at other avenues first before taking the easy option of blaming SF.

hyakkii 15-11-2005 04:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by DABhand
I myself have a raid system running. And ive been using SF games for quite a while now, once I had a problem with a CD being not recognised, other than that ive had no problem, and that one problem I contacted SF about it and they gave me a fix for it, not a problem.


Infact they will help you, if you ask them nicely, they arent the bad guys, they are trying to make a product that stops piracy and doing a good job at it.


Again they give support, but only to genuine users, on their forum you see countless warez users trying to get support but always fall at the first hurdle when they cant provide a genuine key or system information (always missing the important bits out).


Im not saying all people here are warez users, but most are, there is no doubt in that, and its the warez users who are offcourse finding it hard, so when they seen Grumpy's good thread about it, most of them make up the stories and add to it (again not all of them).


When SF starts it authenicates a disc, and that means benchmarking your drive, if your drive's life is about to give way it could cause the drive to die.

Warez users will have more complications, as that is what the protection is designed for to discourage warez issues.


Im just fed up seeing the same excuse each time "SF did this and that" when it could be the simple fact that drives or hardware were dying or were faulty. So immediately they blame SF. Why not Safedisc why not Securom? They do the same thing now. Each place a system file which resides in the windows folder and keeps watch.


If you got alot of genuine SF users and asked how much problems they had, you would probably find a huge amount of them have had no problems. Like everything nothing is 100% and PC hardware isnt generic like consoles, so there will be cases of incompatibility.

All im saying is, look at other avenues first before taking the easy option of blaming SF.

Its funny though how everyones pc runs fine without starforce installed.
I'm not against cd protection at all but when it goes this far where it can effect the performace and integrity of my pc thats a no-no i dont care if its the best game in the world i still wouldn't buy it or even play the demo.

I am against warez very much so (matter of fact i work for an organization that helps stop it) but i am still for no-cd and backups since thats what the law entitles you to starforce prevents this in turn breaking the law.

Luciel 15-11-2005 04:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by hyakkii
Its funny though how everyones pc runs fine without starforce installed.
I'm not against cd protection at all but when it goes this far where it can effect the performace and integrity of my pc thats a no-no i dont care if its the best game in the world i still wouldn't buy it or even play the demo.

I am against warez very much so (matter of fact i work for an organization that helps stop it) but i am still for no-cd and backups since thats what the law entitles you to starforce prevents this in turn breaking the law.

I've bought and happily played tons of Sf3 games (toca rd 2, panzers phase 1, both trackmanias, soldiers: howw2, etc, etc, etc...) and i've never EVER had any problems with SF3.

hyakkii 15-11-2005 04:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Luciel
I've bought and happily played tons of Sf3 games (toca rd 2, panzers phase 1, both trackmanias, soldiers: howw2, etc, etc, etc...) and i've never EVER had any problems with SF3.

I'm not saying everyone will have problems but some people with untested or more uncommon hardware / software combinations might wreck havok with their protection ..

after my experiance i wouldnt touch it with a ten foot pole since i know what its capable of, many users don't think of the problems until it happens to them slowly & severly (many issues go un-noticed for example a simple application crash might be related and since the driver is hidden its hard to acuse and most average users wouldn't even know it's there) another reason the company can get away with it "how can something that doesn't exsit cause a problem" :)

All im saying is its going to far with these protection ..jailing us treating us like criminals i prefer not to support it. what will be next ask for ssn number / modify mbr / online license aquire (like ms DRM) / dongle / install their own os..etc?

everyone should read that sony rook kit url i posted its really intresting at what schemas they are coming up with
:)

Joe Forster/STA 15-11-2005 04:43

@hyakkii: I'm sorry but even if you have the right to create a backup of your original CD/DVD, the developer/publisher doesn't have to make it easy for you. So, no, Starforce (or any copy protection, for that matter) does not break the law. (No, I don't want to defend Starforce at all...!)

Zulu 15-11-2005 05:01

Not unimportant:
http://www2.daemon-tools.cc/dtcc/sho...9&postcount=24

DABhand 15-11-2005 05:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by hyakkii
Its funny though how everyones pc runs fine without starforce installed.
I'm not against cd protection at all but when it goes this far where it can effect the performace and integrity of my pc thats a no-no i dont care if its the best game in the world i still wouldn't buy it or even play the demo.

I am against warez very much so (matter of fact i work for an organization that helps stop it) but i am still for no-cd and backups since thats what the law entitles you to starforce prevents this in turn breaking the law.


The Law does NOT say you can backup everything when you like..


It says you CAN backup when PERMISSION is given from the author/publisher.


If you backup a game that the publisher did not give consent to, you are then breaking the law.


And it doesnt matter what country your in, its the owners right to allow you to have a backup or not, it is them who say if you can or not, not the government.

wildwing 15-11-2005 05:59

HOLY
DT4 is best **** ever
maybe DT4 pro will be better!

looks like SFcure cuz same ****.. disable cd/unplug drivers ect

hyakkii 15-11-2005 06:03

U.S. Copyright laws allow you to make one backup copy of software you own. However, that backup copy is "tied" to your original. If you sell or give away your original software, you must destroy your backup copy or package it with the orignal when you sell or give it away. Likewise, you may not sell or give away your backup copy without the original.
Of course, with the advent of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), breaking the copyright protection on a piece of software you own has been made a crime in many cases, so if the software you are backing up implements copyright protection, it may also be illegal.

also the law US Code collection :P http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/h...7----000-.html

but again these are us laws im sure it varies greatly country to country

it says no where you need the software creators permission to make a archival backup it might differ if it was in the eula. but almost every game's eula would never hold up in court

MrEnirO 15-11-2005 06:36

So DM4 works whit Splinter Cell Chaos Theory. or what? How to run it?
Did any body try DM4 whit Cossacks 2?? Does it help?

Luciel 15-11-2005 06:47

Again, if you dont like the protection well dont buy it, i'm sure they are aware of sf3 driver confliction problems (because that's all it is, driver conflictions, and you said hyakkii, it provably comes down to that, hardware combinations. To be honest i doubt a hell of a lot that they did it on purpose, i mean why would they? I'm also sure that they are working to fix it as obviously they just loose clients like that. And about the what next, i think it should all be internet or phone activation (a free worldwide number of course).

ataxy 15-11-2005 06:48

well on my side i still cant run civ4 with my a120% image i stil have to run it with antiblaxx as for scct ill have to buy it back as i sold my copy

DABhand 15-11-2005 07:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by hyakkii
U.S. Copyright laws allow you to make one backup copy of software you own. However, that backup copy is "tied" to your original. If you sell or give away your original software, you must destroy your backup copy or package it with the orignal when you sell or give it away. Likewise, you may not sell or give away your backup copy without the original.
Of course, with the advent of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), breaking the copyright protection on a piece of software you own has been made a crime in many cases, so if the software you are backing up implements copyright protection, it may also be illegal.

also the law US Code collection :P http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/h...7----000-.html

but again these are us laws im sure it varies greatly country to country

it says no where you need the software creators permission to make a archival backup it might differ if it was in the eula. but almost every game's eula would never hold up in court

It doesnt say that, it says you can make a backup if you have a contract to do so, just buying a game doesnt give you this contract, if stated in the EULA or in other print that the publisher allows you to backup the software then its fine, if they do not give you any permission you cannot.

Joe Forster/STA 15-11-2005 07:28

@hyakkii: Don't bother, DABhand just doesn't grasp the fact that a country's own laws have higher priority than the EULA which is just a contract between two people/companies. [Edit: See http://fileforums.com/showthread.php?t=70244#post279673 ]

crypto6600 15-11-2005 07:49

I don't know about us laws or any other laws to be honest :P but there is AN INTERVIEW with some geek female from Starforce team on the Firing Squad website , and they asked her alot about the damned hardware crap
and she said that in some earlier versions and some other versions there was some conflicts between thier protection driver and some USB devices , causing them to malfunction .

Another benchmark on some tomshardware forum ( i will get the link later ) shows that starforce games tend to be slower in terms of fps, cuz Someone there think that the starforce protection service is running while the game is running as well ,, taking some memory and cpu usage .

I am not sure of the later , but I am sure of the first one , my Nokia MMC card reader ( Nokia 6680 ) WAS NOT getting detected in windows , until I Uninstalled SF . and I am not a computer newbie or anything here just flamin the hell out of starforce, actualy it's a 2 Headed weapon , it's very hard to crack ( I guess so ) and it really makes legal users in PAIN .

but I am glad that EA / UBi / Valve and ID are not tending to use such technologies .. YET .

dajunka 15-11-2005 07:57

Here's a wierd one. I installed Deamon tools 4 and got X3 to work great first time from a image without unplugging any drives or using any tools. But when I tried the same on my other computer, it dident work, yet both systems are practicly the same. What ever is stopping my other computer must be something simple, but what?

prollfin 15-11-2005 08:09

I guess, and I read it somewhere on these forums: someone was asking if he had to remove Alcohol to make it work. The thread starter answered that he never had it installed but was going to try it with Alcohol installed. After he had Alcohol installed, it didn't work anymore. Even not after removing it again. So maybe you have or had Alcohol installed on the second machine?

crypto6600 15-11-2005 08:21

good so i am not alone :P DT4 does work for me without unplugging !

DABhand 15-11-2005 08:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Forster/STA
@hyakkii: Don't bother, DABhand just doesn't grasp the fact that a country's own laws have higher priority than the EULA which is just a contract between two people/companies. [Edit: See http://fileforums.com/showthread.php?t=70244#post279673 ]


A country's own Law can not and never will overpower the owner/s instructions.


Lets not go back to your example way back, where in your language it said "contract" which you never did explain to me what your intepretation of the word contract was..


Again no countrys' law will overpower the right for people to protect their possessions and goods, software being amongst this fact.


If a country were to force this onto software publishers/developers, I can assure you they wouldnt want to release software into that country if they are basically allowing their software to be easily copied and distributed.

TonyTek 15-11-2005 08:42

I got an SPTD (scsi pass through direct) layer error, and it wont let me continue my install, any ideas?

thanks,
-Tony

leezer3 15-11-2005 08:55

Dabhand, this depends on the situation on which the game is in- While the EULA may state that the purchaser agrees to the juridisticion of a certain court, this is most emphatically not the case- To see this, simply have a look at the consumer rights bit at the back of any manual/ EULA- They acknowledge that these differ from country to country, and that they are protected to the maximum extent allowed by national law. Similarly, there have been several cases in the US involving firms who wished to use a juridisticion that was more favourable to them, which have gone against the firms involved.

-Leezer-

dajunka 15-11-2005 09:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by prollfin
I guess, and I read it somewhere on these forums: someone was asking if he had to remove Alcohol to make it work. The thread starter answered that he never had it installed but was going to try it with Alcohol installed. After he had Alcohol installed, it didn't work anymore. Even not after removing it again. So maybe you have or had Alcohol installed on the second machine?

That's it I bet. I had Alcohol 120 installed on my other computer, but not on this one. Now if I can only find the poxy Alcohol file or reg entry thats stopping X3 from playing. Someone somewhere must know. If that's all it is I bet you can play any SF game using DT4.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 23:18.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
FileForums @ https://fileforums.com