FileForums - PZlib (Alternative to Precomp)

Page 7 of 9

« First

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

FileForums (https://fileforums.com/index.php)

- Conversion Tutorials (https://fileforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=55)

- - PZlib (Alternative to Precomp) (https://fileforums.com/showthread.php?t=97888)

Prince4

30-12-2016 06:11

Did anyone fixed the

HTML Code:

ERROR: Stream read error

that felice showed no matter what version i use its the same :(

Viper645

09-03-2017 06:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razor12911 (Post 448876)

The effect of "-l" option.

Then what is the use of l5 and l7 ? to make the compression slower? :p

Razor12911

14-03-2017 11:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Viper645 (Post 456944)

Then what is the use of l5 and l7 ? to make the compression slower? :p

http://fileforums.com/showpost.php?p=448876&postcount=7

:p

78372

25-08-2017 00:43

1 Attachment(s)

pZlib 1300

Removed. You don't need it, you won't get it

Simorq

25-08-2017 05:17

pZlib with large files 10GB problem.

Code:

C:\Users\Administrator\Downloads\Compressed\UA Pro\UltraARC 2801 R3>arc a -ep1 -r -ed -dses -s; -di -i2 -wE:\FFOutput\New folder\ArcTmp -n@CfgTmp\List1.txt -mMMC E:\FFOutput\New folder\Data1.Bin -dpE:\Program Files\Hellblade Senuas Sacrifice\HellbladeGame\Content\Paks

FreeArc 0.67 (March 15 2014) Using additional options: --logfile=_Compression.log

Creating archive: E:\FFOutput\New folder\Data1.Bin using pZLib1

Memory for compression 0b, decompression 0b, cache 16mb

Compressed 1 file, 17,325,579,914 => 26,739,971,247 bytes. Ratio 154.34%   

Compression time: cpu 34.61 sec/real 3033.32 sec = 1%. Speed 5.71 mB/s

All OK

Extract
http://uupload.ir/files/suf6_bug.png

78372

25-08-2017 05:20

May be because of stdio error?

Simorq

25-08-2017 05:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by 78372 (Post 461958)

May be because of stdio error?

Well, I'll do another test with pZLib and report it

Simorq

25-08-2017 06:49

where is the problem?
Direct use of pZLib is no problem.
But in FreeARC, when it decoded, it would give Disk Full.

http://uupload.ir/files/vvcr_hellbla...editor.pak.jpg

78372

25-08-2017 07:33

Weird, will check tomorrow

78372

26-08-2017 05:30

Try compressing with arcdatafile and arcoacked file, and decompress with stdio and ISDone. Then report back please.

-NORO-

26-08-2017 05:49

I tried pzlib 1300 with 17.7 gb files , decompression stuck at 6 or 10 % :confused:
Used stdin/stdout
PS: precompression is really slow compared to pzlib v3 .

Gupta

26-08-2017 06:07

i don't understand what is the whole point of having another variant, its just a waste of testing time
about speed, i will rather prefer stability

i mean you already have ztool,pzlibv3, reflate,precomp
posting another scoped variant just create headaches for novices, others will never bother download this even,
of course, in respect to razor's work, it just adds a unworking program to his name, headaches for novices

felice2011

26-08-2017 06:27

The only way to avoid any problems is to use it under the mask, pzlib still suffers from severe bugs. Used with support FA during scanning and compression of the files, if some files do not contain streams, pzlib generates an error Inside not reported, but compression of the archive seems to be successful. At decompression we get the classic errors detected from pzlib.;)

-NORO-

26-08-2017 09:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrinceGupta2000 (Post 461991)

While you prefer stability others do prefer speed ,btw ztool doesnt give same ratio as pzlib do.
If he continues to work on it , it will be an improved version of pzlib.

Chayan Manna

26-08-2017 09:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by -NORO- (Post 462000)

btw ztool doesnt give same ratio as pzlib do.

Yeah, ZTool gives better ratio than pZLib.

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:04.

Page 7 of 9

« First

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page