FileForums

FileForums (https://fileforums.com/index.php)
-   Conversion Tutorials (https://fileforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=55)
-   -   ZCM with Freearc (https://fileforums.com/showthread.php?t=98323)

Razor12911 30-09-2016 11:27

Cls-zcm
 
2 Attachment(s)
Here's CLS, only ran one test.

It shows progress as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ~MAK~ (Post 452248)
Decompression with Freearc is not currently available, still I will try my best.

was a little bit quicker than you. :p

felice2011 30-09-2016 11:33

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....you're unique:eek:

Razor12911 30-09-2016 11:40

Thanks but it was nothing, took 20 minutes to make, big projects take months to make.

aswadd 30-09-2016 12:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razor12911 (Post 452302)
Thanks but it was nothing, took 20 minutes to make, big projects take months to make.

:D you are the big boss here , Just one question how can i open the temp files of arc [ $$arcdatafile$$.tmp ] , I feel like if i could open it & see the content , i can do something external to fix zcm problem

Razor12911 30-09-2016 13:35

why would you want to open those? if the temp is produced by freearc, then it's just concatenation of all the files that are about to be compressed, can't open that because there are literary no headers of some sort but if the temp is produced by previous compressor then just use previous compressor to decompress.
For example, precomp+srep+zcm
the first data temp is for precomp which is just pure concatenation, srep will have data temp but the only thing that can open it is the previous compressor which was precomp, zcm will have its own data temp which is created by srep to decompress so all in all, there'll be 3 data temp, you decompress, you get data srep data from zcm, decomrpess again, you get precomp data from srep, decompress again, you get the concatenated data which is useless but from precomp, long story short, there is no point in trying to do what you want to do.

Razor12911 30-09-2016 13:40

2 Attachment(s)
Tested on Battlefield 4 update files, compressed with LZMA2 then ZCM, diff was 5mb but ****, life is too short people. 1mb/s compression speed, 1mb/s decompression speed, is it really worth it? 5mb better off but have grey hair.

felice2011 30-09-2016 15:12

It all depends from the viewpoints, I personally think that the comp/time ratio is not bad.:p

http://i67.tinypic.com/2iv1y11.png

Razor12911 30-09-2016 15:25

1 Attachment(s)
Well

felice2011 30-09-2016 15:32

HOOO ...:eek: HA HA HA.....but we're not on Top Gear with Jeremy Clarkson :p:p

Razor12911 30-09-2016 15:38

1 Attachment(s)
Dude, I live by the speed code, if something can't reach 30mb/s, it's not good enough, I'm not really a person of size, storage devices sizes are getting bigger and bigger, I don't mind trading a few mbs or gbs for more speed.

What I don't like is sitting in front of PC like this bear.

felice2011 30-09-2016 16:09

Ha Ha not have lunch with that one there ... ok ok but since you like speed and power, I also like a ...

http://i65.tinypic.com/wuijro.jpg


... like this ...;)

~MAK~ 30-09-2016 18:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razor12911 (Post 452300)
Here's CLS, only ran one test.

It shows progress as well.


was a little bit quicker than you. :p

Thanks matey for helping :)

ChronoCross 30-09-2016 18:14

Works perfect!
Less size of chunks decompress more faster?
And thanks aswad you make this possible with your question. LOL.

~MAK~ 01-10-2016 01:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChronoCross (Post 452318)
Works perfect!
Less size of chunks decompress more faster?
And thanks aswad you make this possible with your question. LOL.

haha, thanks to razor for accepting my request :P

Atleast by opening this thread, finally ZCM is compatible with FreeArc :P

1234567890123 01-10-2016 06:32

is there a way to use it with -t0 it will be very fast and thank razor


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
FileForums @ https://fileforums.com