![]() |
Quote:
Cesar, "cls-mtx.dll" supports this feature, since v2.0.0.3. and unpackcmd should be like, ( without inverted commas (") ) (i'll fix this issue in the next update.) Code:
[External compressor:bcm]here is the full example, ;) cls-mtx Example - Cesar.rar |
Quote:
Code:
[External compressor:bcm]Thank you. |
Quote:
that's not a problem. you can set the path without ("). (note that: for cls-mtx :cool:) like this.. Code:
[External compressor:bcm] |
Quote:
But if the path was something like that, would it work too? Code:
[External compressor:bcm] |
Quote:
yup, of course ;). those characters must be valid characters. but this is wrong. Code:
packcmd = Res\Bcm compressor\bcm -9 $$arcdatafile$$.tmp $$arcpackedfile$$.tmp |
Quote:
Currently in CIU it uses this configuration mode that allows the user to inform the command in more than one way. Code:
[External compressor:rz,RZ,razor,RAZOR]If possible, it would be very useful to be able to configure this way (in the next update of CLS-MTX.dll). It also needed to allow the use of compressors without the CLS-MTX, such as using for mtx: [External compressor: mtxrz, mtxrazor, mtx_razor, mtx_rz] and for RAZOR norml to use [External compressor:rz,RZ,razor,RAZOR] This same name variation would be used for other executables like mpzapi and perhaps some others. |
Quote:
all right then. i'm working on it. :D (i've a few exams in the coming days. so it may not be quick. :o) |
cls- mtx Update
cls- mtx Update v2.0.0.5 New update for "cls-mtx". What's New:
New Arc.ini (or any config.ini): Code:
[External compressor:mtx_rz, mtx_razor, mtxrz]Inputs: (that supports) Code:
1. $$arcdatafile$$.tmpOutputs: (that supports) Code:
1. $$arcpackedfile$$.tmp |
@BLACKFIRE69
I have messaged you my setup, I copied the line from your SetIniString example but it does not work. Maybe a second pair of eyes to look could really help. It's on line 1950 |
Quote:
|
cls-mtx New Update
cls-mtx New Update v2.0.0.6 What's New:
and i was able to reduce the final size from "191 kb" to "100 kb". :D _ |
@BLACKFIRE69
Thank you for the update, however a huge bug has been introduced. Nothing has changed in my arc.ini since I added the new version to my compressor: Code:
Compressed 119 files, 13,245,186,961 => 1,672 bytes. Ratio 0.00%The folder being compressed is ~700MB and sometimes it says all 700MB becomes 1kb, other times like the above it only recognises some of the data. |
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
no. it works without problems. more details plz. what about my example compressor? or send me related files. |
@BLACKFIRE69
Yes with your compressor it works, but I did not change a single config between last time I used MTX and this time. Perhaps I should fully remake my compressor and tidy things up? I'll get back to you after I try sort it. Sorry for wasting your time... Edit: I have mailed you an example compressor, I tried rewriting 3 times but it keeps returning <1KB files :( |
Quote:
ok, check my answer i solved your problem. ;) and guys, since v2.0.0.5, the keyword "{compressor}" is no longer supported on arc.ini. please see the example. |
Update What's new:
* cls-mtx supports two methods. Code:
1: The simple wayCode:
2: Alternative method |
Test
Left 4 dead 2 2.2.0.1 *.WAV (srep+mtxrz) Quote:
|
cls-mtx October Update
cls-mtx October Update v2.0.0.7 What's new:
|
Any members tested the accelerator, using DLZ compressor in multi-core PC's?? (x86 or x64 and more CPU cores 2/4 to 8-16)
|
Quote:
|
I know lolz is better. For testing, you should do this to see if it can be better with MTX, the speed of (de)compression. Lolz, however, you can't pack on old X86 machines. (The unpacking only, we leave it now.) While with DLZ yes. DLZ is more faster compared (data dependent case) to FreeArc internal lzma codec. Up to 2x speed.* (Without cu2 or cu3 and cm40/43 switches.) The compression rate is often better (1-2% to few percentage), even for smooth data. (DDS files has in up to 5-15%) This cm10 or cm00 no effecting or minimally in decompression speed. For the most extreme settings, the unpacking is slow, true. Compared to OGGRE, even 2* is still more faster.
This range from DDS files compression: 1. LOLZ (its probably best, without MSC!) 2. DLZ (no MSC) 3. MSC + FA's lzma or use "FA's lzma" compression replacement use this lzma part from DLZ 4. FA's lzma or any lzma1/2 compressor *Note: This DDS/DXT datafiles decompression speed comparable the FA's internal LZMA compression. (uses lzma's only switches.) Minimally slower. This "DATA"-typed compressed data (This DLZ printed type to out from CMD window) comparable or barely faster than FA's lzma algo. More tests req. from old PC from comparison. (Using and find ~0.5-1GB test data.)** **More DDS samples, any games resources, text, sounds/videos, exe/dll binaries or any more. Extra questions: Original DLZ Package has been release originally in UPX'ed files?? |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 14:06. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
FileForums @ https://fileforums.com