no no I don't use reflater.exe (and cls-reflate.dll etc.) of @Razor12911.

I use reflate.exe to extract *.arc files to raw and after Raw files would be recompressed with precomp.
and at the last I put all the files in a folder and I compress these with msc+srep+lzma.
and it gives 4.1 - 4.2 gb compressed archive.

when I am free, I will share all the files for each steps.
and I will explain them again. ok?

I'll be waiting hasandgn34

what is the different between of them? using razor's reflate or extracting raw files in arc files??

it is realy very good tool. but is limited 2GB input data to rebuild. but the game has 30 gb arc files. :D
that is why, use reflater or I use rawdet and after rebuild all the raw files manually.

read the introduction and compress all the mad max files to 4.2 gb

Invalid Attachment!

Hasandgn34!

thank you very much

did you try?

that method is going to take so long especially guys with normal hdd's and slow proccessors.i have tested multi methods anything with precomp brute it crazy times.and msc dont wont on those arc files as they are encrypted.

yes it takes to many times, but msc is working after precompressed file on brute with precomp. size will change.

Got a chance to look at this game and I was right about this.
Reflate easily gets you 4GB without the need of precomp nor msc.
Compression takes about 8 hours.

You have to use this
http://fileforums.com/showthread.php?t=96138

thanks

yes, if you see the files I send ,i used similar methods to this.

it means, gozarck used rawdet and later raw2hif.exe.
but, I used rawdet and later precomp for some files, because generals of them can be recompressed on brute mode with precomp already. :D

:rolleyes: Well, you are seeing what I see, but others are ignoring it...Thats why they need to use Precomp...

Man, how lazy can ya guys be...

http://fileforums.com/showpost.php?p=449397&postcount=9

Remember, we talked about JC3, this is the thing which you need to compress them without Precomp.

Its been lying around for about a month but no one noticed it yet created 6 new topics for the same old question which was answered back there. :mad: