PDA

View Full Version : Flatout 2 v1.2 crack?


XtremeX
11-01-2007, 10:51
Vampyres have released a crack & I cant find it anywhere :confused:
Does anyone have it & want to upload it to GCW?

chron
11-01-2007, 10:52
I think it has been allready sent to gcw. Wait for tomorrow.

..:: Popeye ::..
11-01-2007, 11:11
I have sent it.Think tomorrow you will see it.Have upload the 1.2 crack + the unleashed + 2 trainer for the 1.2 update.Have fun with it :)

BarryB
11-01-2007, 11:41
Jeez, hope those 'vampyres' cracks don't turn out like those fake Carbon cracks :)

XtremeX
11-01-2007, 12:08
I have sent it.Think tomorrow you will see it.Have upload the 1.2 crack + the unleashed + 2 trainer for the 1.2 update.Have fun with it :)

Nice one :)

chron
11-01-2007, 12:27
@BarryB:
Its just a feeling but I think VAMPYRES=FLT because they use the same method to "protect" their cracks (modified UPX) which would be senseless if the cracks are from "real crackers".

Also flaming on a nonscene cracker in their nfo (maciozo) is not fine.

BarryB
11-01-2007, 13:29
maciozo is only trying to help, why should some n00b group just pop up to flame him?

Ah well, if it kickstarts other groups to start making DOX again then it's not all bad!

Joe Forster/STA
11-01-2007, 14:27
Being flamed means that you're already someone worth flaming!!! :D

BarryB
11-01-2007, 16:39
I want to be flamed, me me me, I want to feel like someone worth flaming, not fair maciozo gets all the attention :(

/me spits out dummy and pouts.

:D

wolfsrain
12-01-2007, 00:56
@BarryB:
Its just a feeling but I think VAMPYRES=FLT because they use the same method to "protect" their cracks (modified UPX) which would be senseless if the cracks are from "real crackers".

Also flaming on a nonscene cracker in their nfo (maciozo) is not fine.
Can you tell me in what nfo did they flame maciozo? I'd like to see that.
And I also, don't understand why they would flame him. Maciozo, clearly shows improvement, his cracking is a lot better and he admits his mistakes(see desperados2 cracks or the late sid meier railroads v1.10). Me, I appreciate a person who has the guts to admit that he made a few mistakes, but it's also capable of correcting those. And he corrected his mistakes.Only the most moronic cracking teams seem to use flaming(Plex was one of them, Procyon-ex Emergence-exwhatever, was another).

BarryB
12-01-2007, 04:24
See this link on NFOrce:

http://www.nforce.nl/index.php?switchto=nfos&menu=quicknav&item=viewnfo&id=110466

wolfsrain
12-01-2007, 05:29
I've read the nfo. They do have a point, but maciozo second stab at that crack was far better. Like I've said, no need to flame someone that at least it's trying. I'm pretty sure that maciozo will develop the necessary skill sooner or later. I'm sure that most of you observed the fact that the large crack packs dissappeared, that the patches released after a game release don't get a crack too often.The vanishing of old cracking groups(due to life problems or legal problems), created quite a vacuum that some indie crackers are trying hard to fill. Some of those indie are not professionals, but they do give their best and they provide a viable alternative until a proper crack is released. That's why I don't think, either, that's okay to flame those people. Instead they deserve the utmost respect for at least trying...I've seen the fact that in their greets old groups like deviance and razor1911 are quite ignored and I wonder why.It's their respect directed toward the groups that can't respond them? Don't know, hope they will explain. And I agree that Unleashed doesn't have any crack experience, but maybe they recruited someone good lately.Dunno... I'd like to know all the sides of a story.

BarryB
12-01-2007, 06:11
Have you heard of paragraphs? :)

The attitude of most groups is if you release a crack, make sure it's a 'proper' crack and working. By proper they mean a cracked EXE from the official update, not a demo, digital download or unprotected EXE from another source, hence maciozo getting pulled up for using EXEs from ActiveMARK games, they feel it's probably giving the scene a bad name?

What these 'flaming' groups need to do is provide proof positive that maciozos cracks will fail, and exactly what happens and where in the game. Just saying they will slow the game down and create trial files is not real proof that the crack is 'bad'.

If this spurs groups to release 'proper' cracks then it's a good thing, there are some older updates that need cracking too like Star Wars: Knights of the old Republic 2, Star Wars Battlefront 2, Star Wars Empire at War and Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter to name a few! I wonder if the 'vampyres' will be interested in these as well rather than propering a few AM cracks?

wolfsrain
12-01-2007, 06:33
Paragraphs, yes. Something so old, so old fashioned. Kidding, of course.

If this starts a nice cracking war and brings us some cracks for the games you've mentioned, than even I, I'd be a supporter of flaming. I'd say bring the big guns and prepare the paramedics.

And giving a bad name to the scene, how about to flame the guys from Plex or Procyon....

And you are right, I can also recommend a few patches to crack for them: Age of Pirates: Carribean tales v1.50, GT Legends...Plenty of Starforce protected content there.Patches no one cracked yet.

Value can be seen only in work and respect comes from a job well done and proper conduct.You show respect,you get respect and if you do your job done well, you get the recognition for being a pro and acting like one.

voodoo_nbgd
25-01-2007, 03:10
If this spurs groups to release 'proper' cracks then it's a good thing, there are some older updates that need cracking too like Star Wars: Knights of the old Republic 2
As far as I know, the latest version of KotOR 2 (v2.1) is already cracked by Carbon and it's working fine.

BarryB
25-01-2007, 03:36
Those Carbon cracks were FAKE!

They were little more than existing cracks realigned and version numbers changed. If you want to use them, fine, but they are not 'real' cracks!

voodoo_nbgd
25-01-2007, 06:02
How come? There are NO other cracks for KotOR 2 v2.1, they couldn't steal from someone because there were NO other cracks for 2.1. And they were the only guys who bothered to crack the patched version, because the retail KotOR 2 is practically unplayable on some machines. For that, I thank them.
Maybe some other Carbon cracks are fake but this one isn't, because I finished the game like two times with it and it's proper.

mmommo
25-01-2007, 10:18
كس ام المنتدي ده

Joe Forster/STA
25-01-2007, 12:09
Sorry, this is an English-only forum. (Most people, without an Arabic font installed, won't even see what you wrote!)

BarryB
25-01-2007, 12:22
How come? There are NO other cracks for KotOR 2 v2.1, they couldn't steal from someone because there were NO other cracks for 2.1. And they were the only guys who bothered to crack the patched version, because the retail KotOR 2 is practically unplayable on some machines. For that, I thank them.
Maybe some other Carbon cracks are fake but this one isn't, because I finished the game like two times with it and it's proper.

It's the NOGRP cracked EXE modified so it 'looked' like a crack for the update!

voodoo_nbgd
26-01-2007, 02:04
And how come all the bugs fixed in the update are also gone when using this new crack? I mean, if it is a 1.0 crack, shouldn't it anull all the fixes from the patch, since all fixes are contained in the main EXE?

BarryB
26-01-2007, 15:05
There were lots of data files updated, some bugs can be fixed that way! The retail crack works with the patched game as I just reinstalled, patched and copied the v1.0 crack across, game works fine!

I personally don't trust those Carbon cracks, and a few other respectable people on this forum didn't too. But, if it works for you and you're happy with it then that's fine with me :)

voodoo_nbgd
27-01-2007, 02:47
It's not that I don't believe you ;) , I just know Carbon successfully cracked some updates for e.g. Civ 4, so I don't think it is too hard to crack a SecuROM 7 game if they are experienced crackers... however if this is really masked 1.0 crack, it would be nice if someone crack the real v2.1... SecuROM 7 titles are pretty common these days and it should be too much trouble...

chron
27-01-2007, 03:35
It's not that I don't believe you ;) , I just know Carbon successfully cracked some updates for e.g. Civ 4, so I don't think it is too hard to crack a SecuROM 7 game if they are experienced crackers... however if this is really masked 1.0 crack, it would be nice if someone crack the real v2.1... SecuROM 7 titles are pretty common these days and it should be too much trouble...

Mostly these Carbon cracks were fake. Civ 4 also had Safedisc which is a lot different from Securom.

caki
27-01-2007, 15:17
It's not that I don't believe you ;) , I just know Carbon successfully cracked some updates for e.g. Civ 4, so I don't think it is too hard to crack a SecuROM 7 game if they are experienced crackers... however if this is really masked 1.0 crack, it would be nice if someone crack the real v2.1... SecuROM 7 titles are pretty common these days and it should be too much trouble...

Civ 4 cracks were stolen, along with all their other cracks :)

wolfsrain
28-01-2007, 00:49
May I intefere and suggest to keep this thread in the topic area?Please?

BarryB
28-01-2007, 04:40
Agreed! Slack moderating again :D

Chewy25
29-01-2007, 13:30
Crack for v1.2 of this game on GCW that works fine...