Go Back   FileForums > Game Backup > PC Games > PC Games - CD/DVD Conversions > Conversion Tutorials

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 10-09-2016, 20:51
RamiroCruzo's Avatar
RamiroCruzo RamiroCruzo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: India
Posts: 184
Thanks: 386
Thanked 164 Times in 75 Posts
RamiroCruzo is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by panker1992 View Post
dont forget that srep delta and lzma are all based on lz77 matchfinding architecture
At last, someone with knowledge worth to talk...Haha..

You hope to replace every reoccurrence firstly and then again try to do so and hope it will be smaller...LOL...It's Common Sense of Humanity Missus....
__________________
We are such stuff as dreams are made on, and our little life is rounded with a sleep.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #17  
Old 11-09-2016, 08:31
FitGirl FitGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Riga
Posts: 104
Thanks: 9
Thanked 93 Times in 61 Posts
FitGirl is on a distinguished road
[QUOTE=panker1992]Srep can indirectly show if delta is good or not, anything srep's ratio can go below 70 or 65% then delta helps./QUOTE]
Not corrensponds to my tests at all. Especially bad delta behaves on different textures data. As SREP is just a simple LZ77 with extra-large dictionary, it can't say if the data consists of binary tables or not.

In my brute-forcing sctipts is always one of the steps, but as i said above, it rarely gives any benefit, but makes compression worst in much more cases.

Mad Max is a good example. It hase astonoshing srep removal rate, but using delta will hurt the compression ratio due to lots of textures inside.

Last edited by FitGirl; 11-09-2016 at 09:07.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FitGirl For This Useful Post:
aswadd (25-10-2016)
  #18  
Old 11-09-2016, 09:33
Razor12911's Avatar
Razor12911 Razor12911 is offline
Coder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 3,079
Thanks: 1,619
Thanked 7,255 Times in 1,701 Posts
Razor12911 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FitGirl View Post
Well, I hope they won't remove my "delta thoughts", cause this is too real
Nah, it's not that it's just that back in the days, you mentioned a warez group, you got a warning or the thread is closed, or banned. Things change I guess.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RamiroCruzo View Post
Hey Razor bro, whats up?
The sky?
__________________
Looking for something?
Visit the
Tutorial Index

Last edited by Razor12911; 11-09-2016 at 09:39.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Razor12911 For This Useful Post:
RamiroCruzo (11-09-2016), romulus_ut3 (19-09-2016)
  #19  
Old 13-10-2016, 02:54
Chayan Manna's Avatar
Chayan Manna Chayan Manna is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: India
Posts: 82
Thanks: 89
Thanked 95 Times in 37 Posts
Chayan Manna is on a distinguished road
Got it !

Corepacks Just use a modified Version of Precomp. They Use Precomp+Srep64+Lzma64.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 13-10-2016, 03:45
Razor12911's Avatar
Razor12911 Razor12911 is offline
Coder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 3,079
Thanks: 1,619
Thanked 7,255 Times in 1,701 Posts
Razor12911 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chayan Manna View Post
Corepacks Just use a modified Version of Precomp. They Use Precomp+Srep64+Lzma64.
Modified precomp? :v since when they know how to program?
__________________
Looking for something?
Visit the
Tutorial Index
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 13-10-2016, 08:58
aswadd's Avatar
aswadd aswadd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Egypt
Posts: 317
Thanks: 84
Thanked 152 Times in 97 Posts
aswadd is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor12911 View Post
Modified precomp? :v since when they know how to program?
Razor I'd like to ask you because i saw a Zlib1.dll which is around 50 kb , the one we use is around 100 KB I found it in SYter Repacks so any difference ??
Updated
the same as FitGirl the both are using Zlib1.dll with precomp038 which is 59 KB Those 2 Guys are using same methods / tools almost the same
updated
Same as precomp 321KB , original ~600kb less size than usual so is they using a modified version or they are basically compressing it ??
updated
also precomop043
original size 1.015 KB the one they are using is 1.160 KB now i don't think they compressed the files I'm not sure about it's modified or not But maybe i'll do some speed tests

Last edited by aswadd; 13-10-2016 at 09:05.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 13-10-2016, 09:24
Razor12911's Avatar
Razor12911 Razor12911 is offline
Coder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 3,079
Thanks: 1,619
Thanked 7,255 Times in 1,701 Posts
Razor12911 is on a distinguished road
-Razor I'd like to ask you because i saw a Zlib1.dll which is around 50 kb , the one we use is around 100 KB I found it in SYter Repacks so any difference ??

Well zlib1.dll is a library older versions of precomp used, precomp038-042, basically all precomp executables less than 500kb in size, if more than, it means zlib library is compiled along with exe.

-zlib1.dll as well, 59kb and 100kb, same difference, the 100kb is the latest, I grabbed it from zlib site, there definitely is a reason for the update, so why not grab it, initially it was 59kb zlib1.dll.
the same as FitGirl the both are using Zlib1.dll with precomp038 which is 59 KB Those 2 Guys are using same methods / tools almost the same

the usage of different zlib1.dll doesn't improve compression, plus a lot of people include the library even when its not used, once precomp.exe is more than 500kb or rather 800kb to be safe, it means the exe comes with compiled zlib functions.

-Same as precomp 321KB , original ~600kb less size than usual so is they using a modified version or they are basically compressing it ??

-_-, ever heard of different zlib versions? 321kb is bascially precomp0.38 that uses zlib1.dll.

-also precomop043

1.015 KB is original size, 1.160 KB version contains cls patch that allows for cls-precomp.dll to be able to show progress when decompressing, without patch, either you don't get progress of extraction or cls fails, this patch is made available to every one, it's made by ProFrager.
__________________
Looking for something?
Visit the
Tutorial Index
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Razor12911 For This Useful Post:
aswadd (13-10-2016), Ichiraku2001 (19-10-2016)
  #23  
Old 13-10-2016, 09:51
Razor12911's Avatar
Razor12911 Razor12911 is offline
Coder
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: South Africa
Posts: 3,079
Thanks: 1,619
Thanked 7,255 Times in 1,701 Posts
Razor12911 is on a distinguished road
just ran a benchmark:

precomp038 (321 KB) with zlib1.dll (58.5 KB): 82.3 MB (86*347*072 bytes) > 373 MB (391*155*058 bytes) took 151906 ms
precomp038 (321 KB) with zlib1.dll (105 KB): 82.3 MB (86*347*072 bytes) > 373 MB (391*155*058 bytes) took 143078 ms
precomp038 (1.23 MB): 82.3 MB (86*347*072 bytes) > 373 MB (391*155*058 bytes) took 166093 ms

Same output size, zlib1.dll (58.5 KB) is version 1.2.3, zlib1.dll (105 KB) is version 1.2.8, there definitely is a reason for updates.
__________________
Looking for something?
Visit the
Tutorial Index
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Razor12911 For This Useful Post:
aswadd (13-10-2016), Ichiraku2001 (19-10-2016)
  #24  
Old 13-10-2016, 09:55
aswadd's Avatar
aswadd aswadd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Egypt
Posts: 317
Thanks: 84
Thanked 152 Times in 97 Posts
aswadd is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor12911 View Post
just ran a benchmark:

precomp038 (321 KB) with zlib1.dll (58.5 KB): 82.3 MB (86*347*072 bytes) > 373 MB (391*155*058 bytes) took 151906 ms
precomp038 (321 KB) with zlib1.dll (105 KB): 82.3 MB (86*347*072 bytes) > 373 MB (391*155*058 bytes) took 143078 ms
precomp038 (1.23 MB): 82.3 MB (86*347*072 bytes) > 373 MB (391*155*058 bytes) took 166093 ms

Same output size, zlib1.dll (58.5 KB) is version 1.2.3, zlib1.dll (105 KB) is version 1.2.8, there definitely is a reason for updates.
yes you are right , also decompression is the almost same time
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 13-10-2016, 10:01
aswadd's Avatar
aswadd aswadd is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Egypt
Posts: 317
Thanks: 84
Thanked 152 Times in 97 Posts
aswadd is on a distinguished road
But why fitgirl or syter is using such an old thing ?? I don't think they don't know about Zlib1 updates !! there must be something else Baby yes Baby no :v BTW thnx for ur quick replay Razor ^_^
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 13-10-2016, 11:30
Bulat Bulat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Moscow
Posts: 62
Thanks: 24
Thanked 50 Times in 27 Posts
Bulat is on a distinguished road
delta isn't lz, it's more like multimedia preprocessors like mm in freearc and delta in 7-zip

http://encode.ru/threads/1045-Delta-...s-preprocessor

it's advantageous on binary data such as executables, databases, mail archives, but probably bad on multimedia data like those textures
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bulat For This Useful Post:
aswadd (13-10-2016), gozarck (16-10-2016), RamiroCruzo (14-10-2016), Razor12911 (13-10-2016)
  #27  
Old 16-10-2016, 10:19
Blade2239 Blade2239 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: somewhere in universe
Posts: 70
Thanks: 47
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Blade2239 is on a distinguished road
What's best thing to compress texture files like .dds (without losing quality) and wav audio files files too....
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 16-10-2016, 16:52
gozarck's Avatar
gozarck gozarck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Argentina
Posts: 162
Thanks: 252
Thanked 436 Times in 111 Posts
gozarck is on a distinguished road
Hello Blade2239.
Do you was tried MSC?
__________________
-the science of the useless-
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 16-10-2016, 22:31
Blade2239 Blade2239 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: somewhere in universe
Posts: 70
Thanks: 47
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Blade2239 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by gozarck View Post
Hello Blade2239.
Do you was tried MSC?
Hi gozrack
No didn't tried it is it like Perugino or what means it's an additional file or like comes with any compressor
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 25-10-2016, 02:12
edward99 edward99 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: India
Posts: 58
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 5 Posts
edward99 is on a distinguished road
why do they compress better
because they delete useless files that's why they compress better
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to edward99 For This Useful Post:
mikey26 (19-07-2017)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Masked Compression (Ultimate compression in one go) panker1992 Conversion Tutorials 637 21-04-2018 03:55
Best Compression Format DRAGoN.X Chit Chat 11 07-09-2017 23:13
M&S_Kompressor By DLG felice2011 Conversion Tutorials 93 21-01-2017 08:12
Detect the compression methods of Repackers ? aswadd Conversion Tutorials 49 10-08-2016 18:01
compression -msrep+rep+delta+nzip Danik1B9 Conversion Tutorials 11 21-12-2014 08:13



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:25.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2000-2017, FileForums @ http://fileforums.com