Tap2k1
03-01-2001, 13:16
Why does everyone stress that DJ 2.x be used to burn images instead of 3.x? I've burned images with 3.x and read on this forum about other people burning images with 3.x, without any problems. Nevermind the fact that it's not easy to find DJ 2.x (not that I looked very hard).
So what's the deal? What's so special about 2.x that makes 3.x look like worthless crap?
So what's the deal? What's so special about 2.x that makes 3.x look like worthless crap?